Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
N K Bhatia v. Gargi Anand
The Delhi High Court held that the Plaintiff is entitled to possession and access to the third floor via the common staircase, and unauthorized construction by the Builder must be removed.
Jagjeet Singh Jhaji v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR under Section 25 Arms Act against a petitioner who unknowingly carried live ammunition belonging to a licensed relative, holding that conscious possession is essential for criminal liability.
Naveen Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging medical unfitness for paramilitary recruitment due to varicose veins, upholding the Review Medical Board's decision based on applicable recruitment medical guidelines.
Rohit Kapoor v. M/S Kavi Impex & Anr.
The High Court allowed the petitioner one opportunity to cross-examine the complainant under Section 311 Cr.P.C. despite earlier counsel's failure, subject to payment of costs.
AU SMALL FINANCE BANK FORMERLY KNOWN AS AU FINANCIERS INDIA LTD. v. SATYABIR SINGH & ANR
The Delhi High Court granted interim stay on the Trial Court's order directing FIR registration for alleged forgery in loan documents, recognizing standard banking practices and allowing the Revisional Court to decide on merits.
Connect India Digital Pvt. Ltd. v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to expeditiously dispose of pending applications under Section 102 Cr.P.C. for release of bank accounts, quashing the delay without opining on merits.
Connect India Digital Pvt. Ltd. v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to expeditiously dispose of pending applications under Section 102 CrPC for release of bank accounts, emphasizing procedural fairness without commenting on merits.
Connect India Digital Pvt. Ltd. v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to expeditiously dispose of pending applications under Section 102 CrPC for release of bank accounts, emphasizing prevention of undue delay without expressing any opinion on merits.
Gurpreet Singh v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of attempt to cause hurt to police officers and possession of a stolen vehicle after investigation was complete and charge sheet filed.
ANKITA MEENA v. UNIVERSITY OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court held that maternity leave does not exempt LL.B students from mandatory attendance requirements under Bar Council of India Rules, dismissing the petition seeking relaxation to appear in semester exams.
K.D. College of Education v. National Council for Teacher Education and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging rejection of recognition due to a State Government ban, allowing withdrawal with liberty to file a statutory appeal under the NCTE Act.
Suchibrata Datta Choudhury v. SY Associates Private Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that co-owners must share equally in redevelopment benefits and directed the redeveloper to pay amounts and deliver possession jointly, while penalizing a co-owner for dishonest exclusive dealings.
Rajat Gupta v. Rupali Gupta
The Delhi High Court held that a party cannot be held liable for contempt for withdrawing consent before the divorce decree under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, affirming that mutual consent must subsist until decree and such statutory right cannot be waived by undertaking.
B. Kumaravel v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that delay in holding DPC violated mandatory administrative instructions and directed reconsideration of the petitioner’s promotion and seniority from 2003 under the old recruitment rules despite actual promotion in 2005.
M/S. SIX DEE TELECOM SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. v. CENTRAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES E.P.F. ORGANIZATION
The Delhi High Court held that composite orders under Sections 14B and 7Q of the EPF Act are appealable without pre-deposit under Section 7O, and the EPF Tribunal can grant interim relief without insisting on such deposit.
M/S. SIMPLEX INFRASTRUCTURES LIMITED v. CENTRAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES E.P.F. ORGANIZATION
The Delhi High Court held that composite orders under Sections 14B and 7Q of the EPF Act are appealable without mandatory pre-deposit under Section 7O, setting aside the Tribunal’s conditional stay requiring such deposit.
M/S. DENTSU MARCOM PVT. LTD. v. CENTRAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES E.P.F. ORGANIZATION
The Delhi High Court held that composite orders under Sections 14B and 7Q of the EPF Act are appealable without pre-deposit under Section 7O and set aside the Tribunal's order requiring such deposit for interim relief.
M/S. CALCUTTA TEST HOUSE (P) LTD. v. CENTRAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES E.P.F. ORGANIZATION
The Delhi High Court held that composite orders under Sections 14B and 7Q of the EPF Act are appealable and the Appellate Tribunal cannot insist on pre-deposit under Section 7Q as a condition for interim relief.
DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. v. BAWANA INFRA DEVELOPMENT (P) LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that the 'Sum in dispute' for arbitrator fee calculation under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act includes the aggregate of claim and counter claim amounts, disallowing separate fees exceeding the prescribed ceiling.
M/S UTILITY POWERTECH LIMITED v. M/S AMIT TRADERS
The Delhi High Court held that a principal cannot withhold payment to a contractor due to non-certification by a joint venture partner when the principal is responsible for such certification and no deficiencies are proven.