Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Parvesh & Ors. v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of appellants for murder based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence including last seen testimony, recovery of weapon and clothes, and forensic corroboration.
MS SHOES EAST LTD. v. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
The Delhi High Court held that the suit for refund of earnest money forfeited by DDA is barred by limitation under Section 53B of the Delhi Development Act and dismissed the suit accordingly.
C& C Construction Ltd v. Ircon International Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that an Independent External Monitor appointed by a party is ineligible as an arbitrator under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration Act and invalidated the Arbitral Tribunal's constitution due to restricted appointment procedures, directing reconstitution with a broad-based panel.
Ravinder Saini; Vandana Diddee; Gitanjali Nirwan; Sanjay Singh Kandari; Harpret Kaur Gill; Madhusmita Handique; Sudhir Prasad; Mandeep Parashar; Dayawati v. Brig Sameer Lanba & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions as withdrawn after respondents disposed of petitioners' representations per prior court directions, allowing substantive petitions to be filed subsequently.
Dr. Rajdeep Singh v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that an FIR involving serious sexual offences against a minor under the POCSO Act cannot be quashed merely on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties.
Sulekha Spiarma & Ors v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed cross-FIRs arising from a petty neighborly dispute after the parties amicably settled through mediation and expressed no desire to continue prosecution.
Vishnu Aggarwal v. M/s Jeevan Ram Manoj Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act due to the petitioner's failure to prove the existence of debt and rebut the presumption of no liability.
Vishnu Aggarwal v. M/s Jeevan Ram Manoj Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that the petitioner failed to prove the existence of any debt or liability against the respondent despite issuance of post-dated cheques.
Vishnu Aggarwal v. M/s Jeevan Ram Manoj Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the dismissal of a complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that the petitioner failed to prove the existence of any debt or liability, thereby rebutting the presumption under section 139.
Vishnu Aggarwal v. M/s Jeevan Ram Manoj Kumar
The High Court upheld the dismissal of a complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act due to the complainant's failure to prove the existence of debt or liability despite issuance of post-dated cheques.
Vishnu Aggarwal v. M/s Jeevan Ram Manoj Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act due to the complainant's failure to prove the existence of debt or liability despite issuance of post-dated cheques.
Vishnu Aggarwal v. M/s Jeevan Ram Manoj Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act due to the complainant's failure to prove the existence of debt or liability despite issuance of post-dated cheques.
Vishnu Aggarwal v. M/s Jeevan Ram Manoj Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that the complainant failed to prove the existence of debt or liability and that the presumption under section 138 was rebutted.
Praveen and Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed contractual employees seeking equal pay to first file a representation with the government, maintaining status quo on their service pending decision, relying on the Supreme Court's principle of equal pay for equal work.
Dr. Shikha Kapur v. Jamia Millia Islamia University
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition directing the petitioner to make a concise representation and the University to respond with a speaking order regarding non-implementation of an office order and salary adjustments.
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd v. Sangita Jain
The Delhi High Court adjusted the compensation awarded to a motor accident victim by reducing future prospects addition to 40%, affirming 60% functional disability, and enhancing compensation under certain heads, directing the insurer to pay ₹15,03,758 with interest.
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd v. Sangita Jain
Delhi High Court partially allowed insurer's appeal to reduce future prospects addition to 40% and enhanced compensation awarded to injured from ₹14.05 lakh to ₹15.03 lakh based on injury severity and evidence.
Narendra Yadav v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the admissibility of documents in a departmental inquiry and emphasized the necessity of fair opportunity to cross-examine witnesses under Rule 31 of the Conduct, Discipline & Appeal Rules, 1980.
Dinesh Kumar v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to submit a fresh representation for regularization of contractual employment and ordered the respondent authority to consider it and pass a reasoned order within a specified timeframe.
M/S UNITED NEWS OF INDIA v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR
The Delhi High Court held that the Authority under the Delhi Shops Act lacked jurisdiction to decide wage claims overlapping with a pending Industrial Tribunal reference and directed reconsideration of claims only for the period prior to the Industrial Tribunal's jurisdiction.