Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Arun Malik v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi

27 Aug 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:7293

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to the accused in a POCSO case involving repeated sexual assault of a minor, emphasizing the gravity of the offence and the protective object of the legislation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail POCSO Act sexual assault rape

Sandeep Kumar Bhatt v. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India & Ors.

27 Aug 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:6868

The Delhi High Court upheld the IBBI's order suspending an Insolvency Professional for two years, affirming the Board's disciplinary jurisdiction and limited scope of judicial review under Article 226.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Insolvency Professional Disciplinary Committee Section 220 IBC

Shaily Juneja v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 34 -1 and Anr.

27 Aug 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja
Cites 6 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that failure to issue a mandatory notice under Section 143(2) in reassessment proceedings under Sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act renders the proceedings invalid and quashed the reassessment orders.

tax petition_allowed Significant Section 143(2) notice reassessment Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 147

Mohit Garg v. Union Bank of India

27 Aug 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:6922

The Delhi High Court held that the dismissal penalty imposed on a bank officer was disproportionate and discriminatory compared to co-delinquents, directing reconsideration of the penalty in light of proportionality and parity principles under Article 14.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant doctrine of proportionality Article 14 equality disciplinary penalty parity in punishment

Central Bank of India v. Anuradha Manchanda

27 Aug 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:6497
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the refusal to set aside a five-year-old ex-parte order against the Central Bank of India, holding that negligence and delay without sufficient cause do not justify relief under Order IX Rule 7 CPC.

civil petition_dismissed ex-parte order Order IX Rule 7 CPC setting aside ex-parte order due diligence

Saurav Anand v. Union Public Service Commission

27 Aug 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:7084

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging UPSC's debarment order, holding that the petitioner’s remedy lies exclusively before the Central Administrative Tribunal under Section 14 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant debarment order Union Public Service Commission Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 Section 14

Union of India & Ors. v. Vishvambhar Singh

27 Aug 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:6454-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order granting pensionary benefits including pre-appointment service to the respondent but denied other consequential benefits, dismissing the Union of India's writ petition.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant pensionary benefits Extra Departmental Delivery Agent Gramin Dak Sevak consequential benefits

Indira Gandhi National Centre for Arts v. The P.O. Labour Court-VII & Anr

27 Aug 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:6787

The Delhi High Court held that casual daily wager employees have no right to reinstatement or regularization, awarding compensation in lieu and directing work to be offered as available.

labor petition_dismissed Significant casual worker daily wager regularization reinstatement

Santosh Tyagi v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

27 Aug 2024 · Sanjeev Narula · 2024:DHC:6471
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court balanced the eviction rights of a senior citizen under the Senior Citizens Act with the residential rights of a daughter-in-law under the Domestic Violence Act, directing financial support and alternate accommodation to protect both parties' interests.

family petition_allowed Significant Senior Citizens Act 2007 Domestic Violence Act 2005 eviction shared household

Vishav Bandhu Gupta v. Union of India and Ors.

27 Aug 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:6433-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a senior Income Tax officer for prolonged unauthorized absence and unauthorized scandalous media statements, holding the punishment proportionate and not warranting judicial interference.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant proportionality of punishment unauthorized absence misconduct disciplinary proceedings

Elena Shvedova v. Union of India and Ors.

27 Aug 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:6468-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a Show Cause Notice served by email within six months of seizure under the Customs Act is valid, dismissing the petition for release of seized gold bars.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Show Cause Notice Service of Notice Section 110

Bristol-Myers Squibb Holdings Ireland v. KM Swarnalatha & Ors.

27 Aug 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:6664

The Delhi High Court upheld the patent holder's injunction against an infringing defendant who launched a generic dasatinib product, proceeding ex-parte and imposing costs, while absolving other defendants of infringement during the patent term.

civil appeal_allowed Significant patent infringement dasatinib Indian Patent No. IN 203937 permanent injunction

Riyaz v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

27 Aug 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:6484

The Delhi High Court granted bail to a young accused in a POCSO case involving consensual relationship with a minor, emphasizing real-life considerations and stringent bail conditions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail POCSO Act consensual sex minor

CAMEO OVERSEAS v. THE GLOBAL - V IMMIGRATION & ORS.

27 Aug 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:6477

The Delhi High Court held that a written statement in a commercial suit must comply with procedural requirements to be valid and allowed the petitioner to withdraw the petition with liberty to seek relief before the Trial Court.

civil petition_dismissed written statement commercial suit procedural compliance Statement of Truth

R C NANDA (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS v. KARAMJIT SINGH & ORS

27 Aug 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:6479

The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to expedite disposal of leave to defend applications in a long-pending eviction petition filed under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.

property other eviction petition Section 14(1)(e) Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 bona fide requirement leave to defend

M/S Ajmer Foods Products Pvt. Ltd. v. The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd & Anr.

27 Aug 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:6480

Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a petition challenging NCDRC order for lack of territorial jurisdiction, granting liberty to approach the appropriate High Court.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Article 227 Constitution of India jurisdiction National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission cause of action

Swami Chakrapani Ji Maharaj National President, Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha v. Election Commission of India & Ors.

27 Aug 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:6481

The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant to withdraw the appeal against dismissal of an interim application and directed the trial court to expedite the suit disposal within one year.

civil appeal_dismissed Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC appeal withdrawal interlocutory order

Samarth Trading Company & Anr. v. Thandi Ram Jai Narain

27 Aug 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:6483

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's order allowing the plaintiff to place a Partnership Registration Certificate on record in a suit under Order 37 CPC, dismissing the defendant's petition challenging the same.

civil petition_dismissed Order 37 CPC Order XI Rule 1(4) and (5) CPC Partnership Registration Certificate Section 69 Indian Partnership Act

Naider (Deceased) Thr His LR v. Union of India & Ors.

27 Aug 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:6495

The Delhi High Court dismissed a delayed petition challenging the exclusion of a legal representative in a Land Acquisition Reference Petition, emphasizing laches and finality of proceedings.

property petition_dismissed Land Acquisition Act, 1984 Reference Petition legal representatives impleadment

Brahm Singh v. Om Prakash

27 Aug 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:6496

The High Court granted the petitioner one final opportunity to summon and examine witnesses in a suit for injunction, imposing costs for prior delays and directing the Trial Court to accommodate this within the trial schedule.

civil appeal_allowed permanent injunction mandatory injunction summoning witnesses affidavits