Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Mazhar Ullah v. State NCT of Delhi

30 Aug 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:6554-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the judicial custody remand of a petitioner accused of cyber fraud, holding that procedural safeguards were complied with and the Magistrate applied judicial mind, dismissing the writ petition challenging the arrest and remand orders.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant judicial custody remand Section 41A CrPC notice grounds of arrest Article 22(1) Constitution of India

Reena Gambhir v. State

30 Aug 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna

The Delhi High Court allowed bail and directed supervised disbursement of funds deposited by an intervener to investors in a disputed real estate project, clarifying that disbursement conditions cannot be imposed as bail conditions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail application disbursement of money real estate project investors' rights

JAIN INFRAPROJECTS LIMITED v. STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED

30 Aug 2024 · C. HARI SHANKAR · 2024:DHC:6802

The Delhi High Court extended the arbitrator's mandate by six months under Sections 29A(4) and 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with no objection from the respondent.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29A(4) Section 29A(5) extension of arbitrator mandate

Ministry of Road Transport and Highways v. M/S Dilip Buildcon Limited and Mostobudivelnyi Zahin No 112 (Joint Venture)

30 Aug 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:6815
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the initial conciliation clause in the contract is not mandatory before arbitration unless expressly mandated by the Supreme Court, dismissing the Ministry's petition seeking reconsideration.

civil petition_dismissed Significant conciliation clause arbitration mandatory provision Supreme Court judgment

Om Kumar v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

30 Aug 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:9557-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court allowed restoration of an Original Application dismissed in default, holding that delay due to counsel's laxity is not sufficient ground for dismissal and courts should adopt a liberal approach in restoration matters.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant restoration application delay in filing counsel's laxity Central Administrative Tribunal

Nippon Steel Corporation v. The Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trademarks & Anr.

29 Aug 2024 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:6514

The Delhi High Court set aside the refusal of a patent application for a method of repairing a gas flue, holding that rejection under Section 3(d) without clear objections and reasoning violates natural justice and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Patent Act 1970 Section 3(d) method patentability natural justice

Kalyan Singh v. Central Reserve Police Force

29 Aug 2024 · Rekha Palli; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:6619-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a CRPF officer injured in service is entitled to retrospective seniority for promotion upon regaining medical fitness but not to arrears of pay.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Senior Time Scale medical category Standing Order 4/2008 retrospective seniority

Vijay Singh v. Jyoti Yadav

29 Aug 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:7339-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a divorce petition but held that a fresh divorce action may be filed on a new cause of action and upheld the imposition of costs by the family court.

family appeal_partly_allowed Significant divorce petition withdrawal fresh cause of action imposition of costs Section 35A CPC

Gaurav Mangla v. Rohit Mangla

29 Aug 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:6588

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's order striking off the defendant's defence for failure to comply with a final court direction to deposit rent pending a partition suit.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXXIX Rule 10 CPC Section 151 CPC partition suit striking off defence

Arun Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.

29 Aug 2024 · Rekha Palli; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:6540-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a DG’s displeasure is not a penalty and cannot alone justify denial of promotion if the officer meets the APAR benchmark, directing reconsideration of the petitioner’s promotion ignoring the displeasure.

administrative petition_allowed Significant DG’s displeasure promotion denial Annual Performance Appraisal Report Border Security Force

M/S S.A. YADAV ESTATE & CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. v. STATE

29 Aug 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:7374

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition under Section 482 CrPC, holding that police investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC is not warranted in a civil dispute where the complainant possesses sufficient evidence and no miscarriage of justice is shown.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 156(3) CrPC Section 482 CrPC police investigation cognizable offence

Davinder Kaur & Anr. v. Directorate of Education & Ors.

29 Aug 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:7301

The Delhi High Court held that recognized private unaided minority schools are statutorily bound under Section 10(1) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 to pay salaries and benefits as per 6th and 7th CPC recommendations, directing payment of arrears with interest to retired employees.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Delhi School Education Act, 1973 Section 10(1) Central Pay Commission 6th CPC

K.K. Electro Appliances Pvt Ltd v. Shree Vardhman Engg. and Anr.

29 Aug 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:6520

The Delhi High Court cancelled the respondent’s trademark registration for 'INDO AIR' in Class 11, holding it infringed the petitioner’s prior registered trademark 'INDO' due to deceptive similarity and likelihood of confusion.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement deceptive similarity prior user likelihood of confusion

Ram Singh v. State N.C.T. of Delhi

29 Aug 2024 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2024:DHC:6582

The Delhi High Court set aside the conviction of a constable for corruption due to lack of proof of demand and acceptance of illegal gratification, emphasizing that mere possession of tainted money is insufficient for conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act illegal gratification demand and acceptance trap operation

Shambhu Bhardwaj and Ors v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors

29 Aug 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:6543-DB

The Delhi High Court held that street vendors cannot claim stationary vendor status or fixed sites without a vending plan and prior notice is required before demolition of vending structures.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Street Vendors Act 2014 Certificate of Vending stationary vendor mobile vendor

Union of India v. Ravi

29 Aug 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:6776-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing reconsideration of promotion based on an upgraded APAR despite expiry of the original selection panel's validity.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant APAR upgradation Departmental Promotion Committee selection panel validity promotion entitlement

FMI LIMITED v. FAKHRUDDIN SAIFUDDIN BHARMAL

29 Aug 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:6661

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and costs against a reseller for using a deceptively similar trademark infringing the plaintiff's registered mark.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement reseller liability permanent injunction deceptively similar mark

Lalit v. Central Reserve Police Force

29 Aug 2024 · Rekha Palli; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:6617-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a CRPF officer injured in service is entitled to notional Senior Time Scale benefits retrospectively upon regaining medical fitness, but not to arrears of pay.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Senior Time Scale Medical Category SHAPE-I Standing Order 4/2008 Relaxation of medical category

Council of Architecture v. Dobariya Mohit Ramnikal & Anr.

29 Aug 2024 · Manmohan, ACJ; Tushar Rao Gedela, J · 2024:DHC:6615-DB

The Delhi High Court stayed a Single Judge's order directing recognition of a foreign architectural degree not listed under the Architects Act, emphasizing adherence to statutory procedures and expert evaluation.

administrative other Architects Act, 1972 foreign qualification recognition registration as architect Section 14 Architects Act

M/S Prakash Pipes Limited v. M/S Jaiswal Traders

29 Aug 2024 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:6513

The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, restraining defendant no.2 from infringing the registered trademark "PRAKASH" and awarded damages and costs due to defendant's non-appearance and unauthorized use.

civil appeal_allowed Significant summary judgment trademark infringement passing off permanent injunction