Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Vandna Rani v. Indiamart Intermesh Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award dismissing the challenge to employment termination, holding that disputes under Section 30 of the Delhi Shops and Establishment Act, 1954 are non-arbitrable and issues not pleaded cannot be raised at the award enforcement stage.
Raj Kumar v. Sushil Kumar
The High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a cheque dishonour case, affirming that the accused successfully rebutted the presumption under Section 139 NI Act and the appellate court's interference with acquittal requires very substantial and compelling reasons.
Arjan Singh v. Gurbachan Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a clause requiring co-owner consent before sale cannot be enforced as an absolute restriction on alienation and that entitlement to specific performance under such a clause requires trial and evidence.
M/S PAMPAR OVENFRESH FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal upholding administrative recovery of grant-in-aid due to failure to meet Scheme timelines, affirming limited judicial review scope and procedural fairness in administrative decisions.
Maj. Gen. Sanjeev Jain (Retd.) v. Central Public Works Department & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a tender condition requiring prior similar work experience for CPWD contractors, dismissing the writ petition challenging the clarification as neither arbitrary nor unreasonable.
Chasvinder Singh v. M/s Swiss Auto Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an interim injunction restraining the registered proprietor from using the trademark SAP SWISS, holding that such relief requires prima facie evaluation and cannot be granted solely on an unexecuted family settlement.
Union of India & Ors. v. Sh Nandan Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order setting aside termination based on a negative CFSL report without issuing a show cause notice, emphasizing the requirement of natural justice in service matters.
Varre Sai Pranav Sudhanshu v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging UPSC Civil Services Preliminary Examination results, holding that the Central Administrative Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction over recruitment-related disputes under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.
AM Associates India Pvt Ltd v. JSC OGCC Kazstroy Service
Delhi High Court upheld Plaintiff’s ex-parte decree for recovery under a Corporate Guarantee assigned to it, affirming jurisdiction, limitation, and enforceability despite foreign proceedings.
Sanjay Kumar Kamra v. State and Ors
The Delhi High Court granted probate of a duly registered Will under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, allowing exemption from surety bond in an uncontested petition where the petitioner is the sole beneficiary.
Rakesh Kalia v. Sanjay Kumar Vyas
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award rendered by majority arbitrators despite one arbitrator's recusal, affirming that majority decisions bind under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Meena Devi v. Vijay Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld a maintenance order of Rs. 600 per month under Section 125 Cr.P.C., dismissing the petition challenging it due to the respondent's limited income and multiple dependents despite the petitioner's independent property and prior settlement.
Anjali and Others v. Union of India and Others
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition alleging illegal detention and police harassment, holding that police raids and investigations into illicit liquor trade were lawful and no prima facie violation of fundamental rights was established.
Vinay v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that disputes arising from recruitment examinations conducted by NTA fall exclusively within the jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal, and writ petitions challenging such processes are not maintainable before the High Court.
The Commissioner of Central Tax, GST, Delhi (West) v. Adesh Jain
The Delhi High Court held that an accused is entitled to statutory bail under Section 167(2) CrPC if investigation is not completed within the prescribed period, even if earlier bail was cancelled.
Sumit Baisoya and Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs arising from matrimonial disputes under Section 482 Cr.P.C. following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.
BlackBerry Limited v. Controller of Patents and Designs
Delhi High Court allowed BlackBerry's patent appeal, holding that the invention involving automatic media file selection and cache management demonstrates technical effect beyond a computer program per se, directing claim amendments and grant of patent.
Sonu Kumar@ Sohan v. The State (GNCT of Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute.
Vijay Kumar & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354, 506, and 323 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and consent of the complainant, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Pradeep @ Golu v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of a habitual offender charged with murder and arms offences, emphasizing strong prima facie evidence, eyewitness identification, and threats to witnesses.