Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Sarvesh Security Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Institute of Human Behaviour and Allied Sciences
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to extend the arbitrator's mandate by two months under Section 29(A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with no objection from the respondent.
SPML Infra Limited v. Power Grid Corporation of India Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to extend the mandate of the arbitral tribunal by six months under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
SPML Infra Limited v. Delhi Jal Board
The Delhi High Court granted a three-month extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 due to counsel's unavailability and prior adjournments.
9560995495 v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the State and pharmaceutical companies to ensure timely access, transparent pricing, and proper distribution of medicines for minors suffering from Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy, emphasizing the constitutional right to health.
Dimeco Formerly Known As Dimeco Alipresse v. Central Organisation for Modernization of Workshops Through Controller of Stores & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to extend the arbitrator's mandate by six months under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with no objection from the respondents.
Bhadra International India Pvt Ltd & Ors. v. Airports Authority of India
The Delhi High Court held that there is no bar to granting a second extension of an arbitrator's mandate under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and extended the arbitrator's mandate by six months.
TATA PROJECTS LIMITED v. OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LIMITED
The Delhi High Court extended the arbitrator's mandate by three months under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to enable the passing of the reserved award.
M/S JMC-CHEC JOINT VENTURE v. DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION
The Delhi High Court extended the mandate of the learned Arbitrator by four months under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with no objection from the respondent.
M/S AOM ADVERTISING PVT. LTD v. M/S DELHI TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD
The Delhi High Court extended the arbitrator's mandate by six months under Sections 29A(4) and 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, allowing continuation of arbitration proceedings with no objection from the respondent.
FIEM INDUSTRIES LTD v. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD
The Delhi High Court extended the mandate of the learned Arbitrator by three months under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with no objection from the respondent.
Aditya Birla Finance Limited v. Mothers Pride Educational Personna Private Limited
The Delhi High Court extended the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by one year under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to enable resolution of disputes between the parties.
Aditya Birla Finance Limited v. Scholar Tube Education and Learning Solutions Private Limited
The Delhi High Court extended the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by one year under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to enable the conclusion of pending arbitration proceedings.
Mohit Jitendra Kukadia v. Union of India
Delhi High Court held that minor procedural errors in scholarship applications should not bar deserving candidates from receiving benefits under the National Overseas Scholarship scheme and directed grant of scholarship to the petitioner.
Telecare Network (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner is entitled to interest under Section 27A of the Customs Act on delayed refund of excess CVD paid due to mistake, rejecting limitation and duty characterization defenses.
Rakesh Kumar Ghei & Anr. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a 1994 Will, granted Letters of Administration to the petitioners, and rejected objections of undue influence and limitation, emphasizing the need to dispel real suspicious circumstances for probate.
Gurupada Maji v. Enforcement Directorate
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a PMLA case balancing the stringent statutory bail conditions with the fundamental right to liberty due to prolonged pre-trial detention and delay in trial commencement.
Sudhir Kumar & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR against SBI officials for withholding title deeds, holding the bank's lien under Section 171 of the Indian Contract Act lawful and the dispute civil in nature.
Preeti Chawla v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in an NDPS case, holding that bail depends on the quantity of narcotics actually seized and that mere use of the petitioner's premises by accused is insufficient to deny bail.
Amit Singh Bakshi v. Harvinder Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's application for decree on admissions in a property dispute involving contested Wills, tenancy, and adverse possession, holding that disputed facts require trial.
Manuja Sharma v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld pre-arrest bail granted to the accused in a forgery case, emphasizing that bail orders should not be disturbed without compelling reasons and that the merits of the case are to be decided at trial.