Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Baby Rishika v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi

02 Sep 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:7095
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that admission allotments by the Directorate of Education are valid only for the academic year allotted, and without interim court orders during that year, the right to admission lapses after the academic year ends.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Admission EWS/DG category Computerized draw of lots Interim order

Master Vinayak v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi

02 Sep 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:7096
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking admission based on a previous academic year's allotment, holding that such allotment is valid only for that year and cannot be enforced after the academic year ends without an interim court order.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Admission EWS/DG category Computerized draw of lots Interim order

M/s Aryan Cargo Express Private Limited v. Union of India & Anr

02 Sep 2024 · MANMOHAN, ACJ; Tushar Rao Gedela, J · 2024:DHC:7016-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that the appellant company was ineligible for exemption benefits under the extended Companies Fresh Start Scheme 2020 as its restoration order was outside the scheme’s stipulated period and forum.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Companies Fresh Start Scheme 2020 extended CFSS 2020 Companies Act 2013 section 248 striking off

Mohd. Yusuf and Ors. v. State (GNCT of Delhi) and Anr.

02 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:6929
Cites 0 · Cited by 8

The Delhi High Court quashed FIRs under Sections 308/34 and 323/341/506/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement, holding that inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC can be exercised to prevent abuse of process in minor offence cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement abuse of process

Hanny Wadhwa and Ors v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr

02 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:6683

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute, exercising its power under Section 528 BNSS.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 528 BNSS Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC

Sukhvinder Singh and Ors. v. The State (SHO PS Bindapur)

02 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:6679

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing prosecution would be an abuse of the court process.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC

Dinesh & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr

02 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:6681

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR amicable settlement matrimonial dispute

Suraj Sharma and Ors. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

02 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:6689

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC amicable settlement

Namrita Malik v. Kulwant Kaur and Ors.

02 Sep 2024 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:6886
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Delhi High Court held that the bequest under the Will did not lapse on the legatee's predecease, the relinquishment deed and DDA conveyance conferred absolute title to defendant no. 1, and dismissed the plaintiff's suit for lack of cause of action and procedural non-compliance.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Indian Succession Act 1925 Section 105 Will interpretation lapse of legacy

R.K. Jain and Sons Hospitality Services Private Limited v. Union of India

02 Sep 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:6671-DB

The Delhi High Court directed investigation into unauthorized persons accessing data during a GST raid and ordered adjudication of the Show Cause Notice after due process and personal hearing.

administrative other raid legality due process unauthorized access GST officers

M/S. GURUJI ENTERPRISES v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER DELHI GOODS AND SERVICES TAX

02 Sep 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:6670-DB

The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration without reasons violates natural justice and directed cancellation to be effective from the date of the petitioner’s application.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST registration cancellation retrospective cancellation Section 29(2) CGST Act natural justice

Manohar Lal Verma v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

02 Sep 2024 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:6822

The Delhi High Court granted letters of administration without requiring an administration bond to a Class I legal heir in an uncontested intestate succession case with consent of all legal heirs.

property petition_allowed Significant letters of administration Indian Succession Act, 1925 administration bond intestate succession

Vishesh Films Private Limited v. Super Cassettes Industries Limited

02 Sep 2024 · Sanjeev Narula · 2024:DHC:6704
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

Delhi High Court granted injunction restraining Defendant from using "Aashiqui" in film title, holding it infringes Plaintiff's trademark rights in the jointly owned Aashiqui Franchise.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement Film title Deceptive similarity Joint ownership

UPSC v. Shubham Sharma

02 Sep 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:6791-DB

The Delhi High Court remanded the matter to the Central Administrative Tribunal to ensure uniform verification of EWS certificates and prevent discriminatory treatment of candidates in UPSC recruitment.

administrative other Significant Economically Weaker Section certificate EWS verification discrimination in recruitment Central Administrative Tribunal

National Power Training Institute v. Office of Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disability & Ors.

02 Sep 2024 · Sanjeev Narula · 2024:DHC:6786

The Delhi High Court held that the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities lacks jurisdiction to pass interim orders staying transfer of a disabled employee, setting aside such an order as beyond statutory mandate.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities transfer order jurisdiction

Anil v. The State (Govt of NCT) Delhi

02 Sep 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:6784

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a gang rape case due to prolonged trial delay, emphasizing the right to liberty under Article 21 despite serious charges.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Article 21 right to liberty delayed trial

S.B Tripathi v. Dr Punit Kumar Goel & Anr

02 Sep 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:6744

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking contempt action against MCD and police for alleged non-compliance of orders regulating a Sunday market, holding that sufficient measures have been taken to ensure orderly conduct without obstructing traffic or pedestrians.

administrative petition_dismissed Contempt of Court Street Vendors Act 2014 Public Market Regulation Encroachment

Pandey v. V-MART RETAIL LIMITED

02 Sep 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:6745

Delhi High Court set aside dismissal of condonation applications for delay in filing written statement, holding that affidavits attested before application drafting are valid and technical defects are curable.

civil appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay affidavit attestation advocate dual role power of attorney

American Epay Services Private Limited v. Orbit In-Te-Rio

02 Sep 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:6742

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition by treating it as a Section 17 application for interim relief to be decided by the Arbitral Tribunal, with interim orders continuing subject to the arbitrator's further directions.

arbitration petition_allowed Section 17 Arbitration and Conciliation Act interim relief Arbitral Tribunal commercial arbitration

Bakshish Singh Chandhok and Ors v. Bhavjot Singh Chandhok

02 Sep 2024 · ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MANMOHAN; TUSHAR RAO GEDELA · 2024:DHC:6734-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the requirement of ad-valorem court fee payment in a partition suit where the plaintiffs admitted ouster from possession by the defendant co-owner.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant partition suit court fee ad-valorem fee ouster