Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED v. HARI OM GUPTA
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order setting aside forfeiture of leave encashment where no financial loss to the government was proved in disciplinary proceedings.
Nidhi Goyal v. Guddu Chaudhary & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging the Trial Court’s refusal to reopen plaintiff’s evidence due to the petitioner’s failure to file the list of witnesses within the mandatory period, affirming the limited scope of revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 CPC.
Staff Selection Commission v. Amitabh Yadav & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the CAT's consent order directing consideration of the candidate as OBC and granting consequential benefits, ordering compliance within four weeks.
Sonu v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 338 IPC following an amicable settlement and compensation, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Amit Kumar & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable matrimonial settlement, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court's process.
Union of India and Anr. v. Ashok Kumar Dhiman
The High Court upheld the Tribunal’s order directing payment of interest on delayed leave encashment, affirming that retiral benefits are valuable rights attracting interest on delay.
M/S SS ENTERPRISES v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER, CGST DELHI, NORTH
The Delhi High Court set aside the rejection of revocation of GST registration cancellation for failure to afford an opportunity of hearing and directed fresh consideration after the petitioner responds to specific allegations.
M/S Chauhan Construction Co. v. Commissioner of DGST and Anr
The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of GST registration for failure to provide intelligible reasons and opportunity of hearing, directing restoration of registration subject to compliance.
Himanshu Khatter and Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Subhash Arora v. Kalvinder Singh Sandhu & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the application of a third party claiming possession without title to set aside a decree and protect possession under Order XXI Rules 97 to 103 CPC, holding that possession alone does not bar execution of a valid decree.
Sanjay Goyal v. Shanti Devi
The Delhi High Court held that mere possession as a licensee post-termination does not confer adverse possession, upheld the Respondent's title, and granted stay of execution subject to deposit of decretal amount under Order XLI Rule 5 CPC.
Suyojit Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. IIC Limited
The Delhi High Court held that insolvency or liquidation of a party does not bar extension of the Arbitral Tribunal's mandate under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and granted a six-month extension.
Smt Manju Garg v. Sh Sanjay Gupta & Anr.
The Delhi High Court recorded a lawful settlement agreement reached through court-annexed mediation as a decree and granted a full refund of court fees to the plaintiff under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870.
Ajay Baluja v. Abhishek Dutt
The Delhi High Court decreed a civil suit based on a Settlement Agreement and allowed partial refund of court fees under Section 16A of the Court Fees Act, 1870.
Rizauddin @ Riyajuddin @ Riyajudden @ Pintu v. Union of India & Ors.
Preventive detention orders against a person already in judicial custody are invalid if the detaining authority fails to record cogent material showing likelihood of bail and necessity of detention to prevent prejudicial activities.
Mithila Murada v. Akhilesh Bali
The Delhi High Court allowed the family court appeal directing withdrawal of duplicate visitation applications, regulated supervised visitation, and upheld maintenance payments with arrears clearance, emphasizing avoidance of multiplicity of litigation and child welfare.
Spectra Televentures Pvt Ltd v. Alliance Telenet Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that the plaintiff completed the subcontracted work and is entitled to recover the unpaid amount with interest from the defendant who received full payment from the higher contractor.
Dr Mohd Ashfaq v. Chetan Sharma
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against refusal of interim injunction at a belated stage of a suit, emphasizing the need to demonstrate prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable loss despite delay.
Pawan Bajaj & Ors. v. Gopal Krishan (Deceased) Through Legal Representatives & Ors.
The High Court upheld the impleadment of a deceased defendant's legal representative in a pending appeal based on his undertaking to adopt the deceased's stand, despite an adverse trial court report.
Jagadish Nangineni v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court quashed the Look-Out Circular against the petitioner, holding that in absence of flight risk and with anticipatory bail granted, travel restrictions via LOC are unjustified.