Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Samar Amusement and Education v. Delhi Development Authority

09 Sep 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:6938

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the allotment of a DDA ground for Ram Leela, holding that failure to comply with mandatory online booking procedures and timelines disentitles the petitioner from relief.

administrative petition_dismissed Article 226 Constitution of India Delhi Development Authority Ram Leela ground booking Standard Operating Procedure

Purvi Delhi Vaidehi Trust v. Delhi Development Authority

09 Sep 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:6937
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging cancellation of a public park booking, holding no legal right arises from mere online application and payment without compliance with procedural and regulatory requirements.

administrative petition_dismissed public park allotment Delhi Development Authority booking cancellation Article 226

Dheeraj Wadhawan v. CBI

09 Sep 2024 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:6941
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court dismissed medical bail application of Dheeraj Wadhawan in a major financial fraud case, holding that his medical condition can be managed in jail and emphasizing discretionary nature of medical bail and limits of comity of courts.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant medical bail proviso to section 437(1) CrPC sick or infirm accused principle of comity of courts

Chanpreet Singh Rayat v. Enforcement Directorate

09 Sep 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:6943
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a money laundering case under PMLA, emphasizing the twin conditions for bail, cooperation with investigation, and the weak predicate offence while imposing stringent bail conditions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Section 45 PMLA Bail under PMLA Section 50 PMLA statements

Somnath Bharti v. Bansuri Swaraj and Others

09 Sep 2024 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:6934

The Delhi High Court held that a petitioner cannot seek retention or verification of burnt memory of all EVMs without a timely written request identifying specific machines, limiting verification to 5% of EVMs as per Supreme Court directions, and upheld the Returning Officer's right to release EVMs for reuse.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Representation of the People Act, 1951 Electronic Voting Machines VVPAT burnt memory verification

Sameer Mahandru v. Directorate of Enforcement

09 Sep 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:6933
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to Sameer Mahandru in a PMLA money laundering case, emphasizing the primacy of the right to liberty under Article 21 amid trial delays despite serious allegations.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Prevention of Money Laundering Act Section 45 PMLA Article 21 Constitution

Mohd. Rehan v. Rajinder Kumar Sharma

09 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:6931

The High Court allowed the petitioner one opportunity to cross-examine the respondent's witness subject to payment of costs and directed the Trial Court to fix a convenient date.

civil appeal_allowed cross-examination recall of order procedural fairness costs

Pankaj Jain v. Parul Jain

09 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:6930

The Delhi High Court dismissed the father's petition challenging procedural rulings in a guardianship dispute, affirming the Family Court's jurisdiction and prioritizing the child's welfare over procedural technicalities.

family petition_dismissed Significant guardianship petition custody of minor child transposition of parties territorial jurisdiction

Morgan Ventures Limited v. NEPC India Limited

09 Sep 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:6901
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed contempt petitions alleging wilful disobedience of orders to secure monies realized from debtors, holding that accounting write-offs of bad debts do not constitute contempt and that limitation runs from knowledge of breach.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Contempt of Court Arbitral Award Section 9 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act

Shyam Sunder Sethi v. Delhi Development Authority

09 Sep 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:6906

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking allotment of a plot based on a cancelled registration, holding that delay and laches bar stale claims and ordering refund of the deposited amount with interest.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Housing New Registration Scheme 1976 Rohini Residential Scheme 1981 Cancellation of registration Delay and laches

M/S Fresh Pet Private Limited v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi – 1

09 Sep 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:7091-DB

The Delhi High Court held that under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, reliefs granted in the original assessment such as carry forward of losses cannot be denied in settlement proceedings and apparent mistakes in Form 3 are rectifiable to prevent placing the declarant in a worse position.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 Form 3 rectification carry forward of losses unabsorbed depreciation

Mamchand v. Shri Vijay Kumar Khanna and Ors.

09 Sep 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:6900

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking recall of its order and initiation of contempt proceedings, holding that contempt cannot be invoked without a prior court order being disobeyed and directing the petitioner to seek appropriate civil remedies.

civil petition_dismissed contempt of court unauthorized construction alienation of property Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC

Vijay Gaur v. Mr. Taaha Fahim & Ors.

09 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:6964

The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to expeditiously decide the pending Order VII Rule 11 application seeking rejection of plaint within six months, emphasizing timely disposal and cooperation of parties.

civil other Order VII Rule 11 CPC rejection of plaint cause of action delay in disposal

Din Dayal Agrawal v. Siri In Fin Lease Pvt. Ltd.

09 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:6963

The Delhi High Court recalled arrest warrants issued in execution proceedings for non-compliance with mandatory procedure, allowing the executing court to reissue warrants after due process.

civil appeal_allowed Significant execution petition warrant of arrest Code of Civil Procedure Section 47 CPC

Manohar Sr v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Sep 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:2933-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to treat the writ petition as a representation and communicate reasons for the petitioner's downgraded seniority within eight weeks, ensuring transparency in administrative decisions.

administrative appeal_allowed seniority list downgraded seniority representation writ petition

Emerald Industries v. Tata Aldesa JV

08 Sep 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:6489

The Delhi High Court granted a nine-month extension to the Arbitral Tribunal's mandate under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with no objection from the respondent.

civil petition_allowed Arbitral Tribunal Extension of mandate Section 29A(4) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

MINOR N THR MOTHER P v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

07 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:6881
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed a minor rape victim's petition for medical termination of pregnancy beyond 24 weeks gestation, emphasizing reproductive autonomy, comprehensive medical assessment, and informed consent under the amended MTP Act and constitutional rights.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 termination of pregnancy beyond 24 weeks reproductive autonomy minor rape victim

Tek Travels Private Limited v. Gursahib Singh Sethi & Ors.

06 Sep 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024 SCC OnLine Del 1312

The Delhi High Court held that no extension beyond 120 days is permissible for filing written statements under its Rules, but the Supreme Court's pandemic orders excluding limitation period apply to filings during that time, validating defendant no. 2's written statement while dismissing condonation for defendants 1 and 3.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant limitation period written statement condonation of delay Delhi High Court Rules 2018

Manisha v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

06 Sep 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:7390

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the dismissal of a complaint for bigamy under Section 494 IPC due to lack of prima facie evidence of a second marriage.

criminal petition_dismissed bigamy Section 494 IPC Section 200 Cr.P.C. complaint dismissal

Sarpreet Singh Johal v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr

06 Sep 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:7304

Delhi High Court quashed FIR under Section 25 Arms Act against petitioner for possession of empty magazines, holding absence of conscious possession and inapplicability of minor ammunition exemption.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Arms Act 1959 Section 25 Arms Act empty magazines ammunition definition