Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

M/S PIHU ENTERPRISES v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND TAXES GNCTD

09 Sep 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:6912-DB

The Delhi High Court held that cancellation of GST registration cannot be withheld solely due to pending assessment or recovery proceedings and directed the tax authorities to process the petitioner’s cancellation application accordingly.

tax petition_allowed Significant GST registration cancellation Input Tax Credit Section 29 CGST Act pending assessment

Satish Chand Mittal v. Sales Tax Officer SGST, Ward 25- Zone 1

09 Sep 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:6927-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a GST adjudication order for failure to properly serve the Show Cause Notice and denied the petitioner an opportunity of hearing, directing a fresh adjudication.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 73 CGST Act Show Cause Notice service of notice natural justice

Sangeeta Bakshi & Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

09 Sep 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:6968-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for alternate vending site allotment due to delay and non-compliance, directing petitioners to seek fresh licenses under the Street Vendors Act, 2014.

administrative petition_dismissed tehbazari license alternate site allotment delay and laches Street Vendors Act 2014

Rebanta Healthcare Pvt Ltd v. Dr Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd & Anr

09 Sep 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:6926-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte injunction against the appellant's use of the trademark 'REBAHEAL', recognizing prior user rights and directing mediation and merits hearing.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement prior user rights ex parte injunction Section 12A Commercial Courts Act

M/S Kundan Trading Company v. Pr. Commissioner of Department of Trade & Taxes, Government of NCT of Delhi

09 Sep 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:6914-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondent to process the petitioner's GST registration cancellation application without withholding it due to pending proceedings, clarifying that cancellation does not absolve prior liabilities.

tax petition_allowed Significant GST registration cancellation Section 29 CGST Act taxpayer liability CBIC circular 26.10.2018

Akash Jain v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

09 Sep 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:6910

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 138 NI Act, holding that the petitioner failed to rebut the presumption of debt and financial capacity of the complainant, and dismissed the revision petition.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Cheque dishonor Presumption under Section 139 NI Act Rebuttal of presumption

Anant Rao v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr

09 Sep 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:6905

The High Court upheld the conviction under Section 138 NI Act, affirming that admitted cheque signatures raise statutory presumptions which the accused must rebut with evidence, and that service of demand notice by registered post and electronic means is valid.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Cheque dishonour Presumption under Section 139 NI Act Service of statutory notice

Staff Selection Commission v. Ajay Khatri

09 Sep 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:6939-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order allowing a candidate with a non-visible tattoo to join training, holding that invisible tattoos cannot justify medical rejection in recruitment.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant medical fitness tattoo judicial review Staff Selection Commission

Divine Infracon Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle -18, New Delhi

09 Sep 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja

Reopening of income tax assessment cannot be based solely on the DVO report without the Assessing Officer applying independent mind and forming a bona fide reason to believe escapement of income.

tax petition_allowed Significant Section 148 Income Tax Act District Valuation Officer report Reassessment proceedings Reason to believe

KGPS Mechanical Pvt Ltd v. Cinda Engineering and Construction Pvt Ltd

09 Sep 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:7003

The Delhi High Court appointed a substitute arbitrator to continue arbitration proceedings after the original arbitrator recused himself, directing the arbitration to proceed under DIAC rules from the existing stage.

civil petition_allowed arbitration substitution of arbitrator recusal Delhi International Arbitration Centre

Tilak Raj v. Union of India

09 Sep 2024 · Rekha Palli; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:6932-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an employee who voluntarily refuses mandatory pre-promotional training cannot claim ACP benefits linked to promotion, dismissing the writ petition seeking such benefit.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Assured Career Progression Scheme ACP benefit pre-promotional WT course financial upgradation

Chander Kanta v. Gyanesh Bharti Commissioner MCD and Others

09 Sep 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:6949

The Delhi High Court allowed the respondent to self-demolish unauthorized construction and apply for fresh building plan sanction despite a contempt petition, emphasizing that property disputes must be resolved in civil proceedings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant unauthorized construction demolition sealing self-demolition

Sh. Sudhanshu Jaggi & Ors. v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

09 Sep 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:6907

The Delhi High Court upheld interim maintenance granted under the DV Act based on prima facie domestic violence and reasonable income assessment, dismissing the petition challenging the order.

family petition_dismissed Significant interim maintenance Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 domestic violence income assessment

State v. Sarjeet

09 Sep 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:6911
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's petition for leave to appeal against the acquittal in a POCSO case, holding that the victim's contradictory testimony and lack of proof of minority justified the acquittal.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant POCSO Act sexual offence victim testimony contradictions in evidence

Anita v. State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr.

09 Sep 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:6908

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 138 NI Act, affirming that the petitioner failed to rebut the statutory presumption of debt liability arising from admitted cheque signatures.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act presumption under Section 139 NI Act dishonour of cheque rebuttal of presumption

Sindhu Devi v. State of Govt of NCT & Ors.

09 Sep 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:6953-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a habeas corpus petition seeking production of a minor child, holding that the child was voluntarily left with the in-laws and police investigation found no unlawful custody.

criminal petition_dismissed habeas corpus custody of minor voluntary custody police investigation

Naraindas v. Tata AIG Life Insurance Co. Ltd

09 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:6962

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a petition challenging an NCDRC order, holding that jurisdiction lies with the High Court where the cause of action arose.

civil petition_allowed Significant Article 227 Constitution of India jurisdiction National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission cause of action

Bharat Kumar v. The State NCT of Delhi

09 Sep 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:6944-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a habeas corpus petition seeking production of an adult woman who voluntarily left her matrimonial home and did not wish to return.

criminal petition_dismissed habeas corpus voluntary absence adult woman matrimonial home

Pranay Jain v. Shiv Kumar Gandhi

09 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:6961

The Delhi High Court reduced the cost imposed on the defendant for delay in re-filing the written statement in a commercial suit, allowing the petition and directing payment and deposit of the moderated cost.

civil appeal_allowed costs written statement Order XXXVII CPC delay in filing

Sudesh Chhikara v. Baljeet Singh

09 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:6960

The High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of the petitioner's application for production of original documents not in the respondent's possession, allowing adverse inference and secondary evidence as appropriate remedies.

civil petition_dismissed production of documents Order XI Rule 14 CPC Section 151 CPC secondary evidence