Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Sushil Kumar v. Union of India

09 Sep 2024 · Rekha Palli; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:6969-DB

The Delhi High Court held that Group-B officers drawing grade pay Rs. 4,800/- by MACP are entitled to Non-Functional Upgradation to grade pay Rs. 5,400/- after four years, overruling the respondents' denial based on promotion status.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Non-Functional Upgradation Grade Pay 5400 Grade Pay 4800 MACP Scheme

Shakti Singh Thakur v. Union of India and Ors

09 Sep 2024 · Rekha Palli; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:6975-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court held that adverse remarks and downgrading in an APAR based on incidents beyond the reporting period are impermissible and set aside the Accepting Authority’s assessment, directing reconsideration of promotion benefits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant APAR Accepting Authority grading adverse remarks

Sh. Mohan Singh v. Lok Sabha Secretariat and Anr.

09 Sep 2024 · Jyoti Singh, J. · 2024:DHC:7514
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging cancellation of candidature on medical grounds for a Security Assistant post, holding that medical fitness decisions by competent authority are final and no vested right to appointment arises without clearing medical criteria.

administrative petition_dismissed medical fitness provisional appointment ex-serviceman recruitment Coronary Artery Disease

Bhanu Prakash v. Jai Prakash

09 Sep 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:7353

The High Court upheld the trial and appellate courts' orders dismissing the petitioner's claim to avoid payment of electricity and water charges, holding that relinquishment of property rights does not absolve liability for civic amenities and that jurisdictional objections must be timely raised.

civil petition_dismissed Significant civil revision petition Section 115 CPC territorial jurisdiction locus standi

Prabhjot Singh Anand Alias Happy v. State of NCT of Delhi

09 Sep 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:7307

Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the accused in a rape case, considering the possibility of a landlord-tenant dispute and imposing stringent conditions to protect the investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 376 IPC rape landlord-tenant dispute

Akash v. State (NCT of Delhi)

09 Sep 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:7264

Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner accused of violent assault and vandalism due to the serious nature of the offence, early stage of investigation, and evasion of arrest.

criminal petition_dismissed anticipatory bail heinous offence violent assault Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023

Dr Sitanshi Sharma v. Dr Achintya Sharma

09 Sep 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:7163-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the family court's order for lack of adequate hearing opportunity, allowed amendment and condoned delay, and remanded the matter for re-hearing.

family appeal_allowed family court matrimonial dispute opportunity of hearing Order VII Rule 11 CPC

GAIL GAS LIMITED v. M/S SHYAM GLASS WORKS

09 Sep 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:7145-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award on alleged tampering of metering seals, refusing to interfere with the factual findings and denying condonation of delay due to insufficient cause.

civil appeal_dismissed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Arbitral award Metering seals tampering

Mohinder Singh v. Bimal Saxena

09 Sep 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:7155-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a judgment-debtor's one main residential house is exempt from attachment and sale under Section 60(1)(ccc) CPC in execution proceedings, setting aside the lower court's order and directing mediation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 60(1)(ccc) CPC exemption from attachment main residential house execution proceedings

Pavitri Devi and Ors. v. New-Delhi Municipal Council and Anr.

09 Sep 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:6978-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition of unauthorized street vendors seeking protection to continue vending in no-vending zones, affirming that only licensed or specially permitted vendors may operate pending a fresh vending plan under the Street Vendors Act, 2014.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant street vending no-vending zone tehbazari license unauthorized vendors

Ajay Chopra v. State

09 Sep 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:6909

The Delhi High Court upheld the discharge of accused purchasers from cheating and forgery charges, holding that no prima facie case existed against them under Sections 420 and 468 IPC at the charge framing stage.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant framing of charge discharge Section 420 IPC Section 468 IPC

Rohit Chauhan v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

09 Sep 2024 · MANMOHAN, ACJ; TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J · 2024:DHC:7071-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of DDA Regulations restricting subdivision of plots after 2007 and dismissed the challenge to an internal circular reiterating those regulations, allowing revocation proceedings against a building plan sanctioned in violation thereof to proceed.

property appeal_dismissed Significant internal circular subdivision of plots DDA Regulations 2011 building plan sanction

M/S GATI INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LIMITED v. ASHWANI SAINI & OTHERS

09 Sep 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:7036

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte decree due to invalid and contradictory service of summons, emphasizing strict compliance with procedural rules and rebuttable presumption of regularity under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023.

civil appeal_allowed Significant service of summons Order IX Rule 13 CPC Order V Rule 17 CPC ex parte decree

MS. XXXX v. The State & Anr.

09 Sep 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:6913
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the discharge of the accused under the SC/ST Act due to contradictory evidence, delay in allegations, and lack of prima facie proof of caste-based offence at the charge framing stage.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant framing of charge discharge SC/ST Act casteist remarks

Court on Its Own Motion v. State

09 Sep 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:6988-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the State must maintain accurate and updated criminal records to protect fundamental rights, directing adherence to SOPs until technological data synchronization is achieved.

criminal other Significant criminal dossier State Crime Record Bureau SCRB Inter-operable Criminal Justice System

Union Public Service Commission v. Rajender Singh

09 Sep 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:7063-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed UPSC's petition, holding that UPSC's role ends upon forwarding a qualified physically handicapped candidate's case to the concerned Ministry for post allocation, even if the medical board declares unfitness for a specific sub-category.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Physically Handicapped category Engineering Services Examination UPSC role Medical Board fitness

Punjab National Bank & Ors. v. SC Sapra & Ors.

09 Sep 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:7061-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed Punjab National Bank's appeal and upheld the order directing payment of full pension to an employee where the disciplinary authority did not specify any pension deduction.

civil appeal_dismissed pension deduction compulsory retirement Punjab National Bank circular Letters Patent Appeal

Staff Selection Commission and Ors. v. Neha

09 Sep 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:7059-DB

The High Court directed a fresh medical examination to assess the respondent’s functional fitness for Delhi Police Constable recruitment, emphasizing functional capability over mere medical conditions.

administrative other Significant medical fitness recruitment rules functional capability Review Medical Board

Union of India v. Sh. Shishir Dutt

09 Sep 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:7058-DB

The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order granting further time in contempt proceedings, holding that failure to comply with Tribunal directions on APAR treatment amounted to non-compliance warranting contempt action.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant APAR Departmental Promotion Committee Review DPC Contempt proceedings

COURTS ON ITS OWN MOTION IN RE: SUICIDE COMMITTED BY SUSHANT ROHILLA v. Respondent

09 Sep 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:6985-DB

The Delhi High Court directed a comprehensive stakeholder consultation on mandatory attendance norms in higher education, balancing educational standards with student welfare and technological changes.

administrative other Significant mandatory attendance legal education Bar Council of India Rules 2008 higher education