Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Laxman Singh Prajapati & Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

10 Sep 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:7017
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioners' claim to land held as unauthorized occupants, reaffirming prior rulings and holding that repeated litigation without new evidence is an abuse of process.

property petition_dismissed Significant Article 226 Unauthorized occupation Lease determination Abuse of process

Jatin Grover v. Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency Limited IREDA & Ors.

10 Sep 2024 · The Acting Chief Justice; Mr. Justice Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:7011-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL challenging IREDA's recruitment policy and appointments, holding that PILs are not maintainable in service matters and unsuccessful candidates who participated without objection cannot later challenge the selection process.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Public Interest Litigation service matters recruitment policy estoppel

Shutham Electric Ltd. v. Vaibhav Raheja & Anr.

10 Sep 2024 · MANMOHAN, ACJ; TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J · 2024:DHC:7010-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award based on admitted liability, valid service of arbitration notice, and proper appointment of sole arbitrator, upholding the award for repayment of loan with interest.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Order XII Rule 6 CPC Limitation Admission of liability

T N Chopra & Anr v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors

10 Sep 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:6998

The Delhi High Court directed respondents accused of encroaching public park land to submit title documents to enable demarcation, warning of adverse consequences for non-compliance.

property other encroachment public land title deeds demarcation

Raminder Singh & Anr. v. Surender Pal Singh & Ors.

10 Sep 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:6987

The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of a conditional family settlement, holding that contempt jurisdiction cannot enforce conditional obligations or adjudicate familial conduct.

civil petition_dismissed contempt petition willful disobedience conditional agreement family dispute

Shafeena Begum v. Rajender Singh Sisodia

10 Sep 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:6986

The Delhi High Court held that non-payment of mesne profits under an executive decree cannot be enforced by contempt proceedings and directed the petitioner to seek remedy through execution proceedings.

civil petition_dismissed contempt proceedings execution proceedings mesne profits misuse charges

M/S SRI SHYAM INCORPORATION & ANR. v. M/S BANSAL SHOE FACTORY

10 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:6999

The Delhi High Court set aside the order striking off defence for non-filing of written statement during the Covid-19 pandemic, allowing the petitioner one opportunity to file the statement considering the exclusion of limitation period.

civil appeal_allowed Significant written statement striking off defence Covid-19 pandemic exclusion of limitation

Manoj K Gautam v. Israel

10 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:6997

The High Court held that a Trial Court cannot recall an order closing cross-examination without notice and hearing, and set aside such recall orders for fresh consideration with due process.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 151 CPC recall of order natural justice cross-examination

Pranav Ansal v. Kiran Sharma & Anr.

10 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:6996

The Delhi High Court recalled bailable warrants issued against a petitioner wrongly identified as a Judgment Debtor, directing him to appear before the NCDRC for factual clarification.

civil petition_allowed bailable warrants National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Judgment Debtor execution proceedings

Amita Chanana v. Siddharth Sood

10 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:6995

The High Court allowed the appeal against striking off the wife's defence in a divorce petition, directing supply of legible pleadings and granting time to file the written statement.

family appeal_allowed Significant written statement legible plaint striking off defence procedural fairness

Scindia Investments Pvt Ltd v. Scindia Potteries and Services Pvt Ltd

10 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:6994

The Delhi High Court granted the plaintiff a final opportunity to conclude evidence in a long-pending civil suit, subject to the Trial Court's discretion on re-examination and objections, while emphasizing expeditious trial disposal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant adjournment secondary evidence re-examination of witness Article 227 Constitution of India

BAREILLY HIGHWAYS PROJECT LIMITED v. RESERVE BANK OF INDIA

10 Sep 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:6982

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's application for extension of interim relief in a loan settlement dispute, holding that the lenders lawfully rejected the One Time Settlement proposal and that the NCLT is the appropriate forum for adjudication.

civil petition_dismissed One Time Settlement RBI Framework Settlement Advisory Committee National Company Law Tribunal

Ms. X v. The State (NCT of Delhi) and Ors.

10 Sep 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:7232

The High Court held that the Magistrate retains jurisdiction to order further investigation under Section 173(8) Cr.P.C. even after commitment to Sessions Court and directed police to investigate new facts and file a supplementary charge-sheet.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 173(8) Cr.P.C. further investigation supplementary charge-sheet Magistrate jurisdiction

Kabir Paharia v. National Medical Commission

10 Sep 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:6956

The Delhi High Court upheld expert medical assessment disqualifying a locomotor-disabled NEET candidate from MBBS admission, emphasizing deference to medical expertise and existing regulatory standards.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant locomotor disability medical education eligibility NEET (UG) 2024 Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016

Lambodar Prasad Padhy v. Central Bureau of Investigation

10 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:6950
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court quashed FIR against NHAI officer for alleged corruption due to lack of prior approval under Section 17A PC Act and absence of corroborative evidence.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 17A Prevention of Corruption Act prior approval quashing of FIR public servant protection

Dr Ankit Sharma & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

10 Sep 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia

The Delhi High Court upheld ESIC's authority to reduce mandatory service bond tenure from three/five years to one year, dismissing dentists' petitions seeking to enforce original bond terms.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant service bond Employees State Insurance Corporation bond tenure contractual right to employment

Geeta Arora @ Sonu Punjaban v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

10 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:6959

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellants' applications for suspension of sentence during appeal, holding that no cogent grounds existed to override the gravity of offences involving trafficking and sexual exploitation of a minor.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant suspension of sentence Section 389 Cr.P.C. trafficking kidnapping

Sukanya Mondal v. Directorate of Enforcement

10 Sep 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:6967

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to Sukanya Mondal under PMLA considering her status as a woman, medical condition, parity with co-accused, and completion of investigation, while emphasizing the need for judicious bail discretion under stringent economic offence laws.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act Section 45 PMLA Regular Bail Doctrine of Parity

Sonu Rajput v. Union of India and Anr

10 Sep 2024 · Rekha Palli; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:7002-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition directing a fresh medical examination for a female candidate declared unfit due to overweight post-pregnancy, emphasizing reasonable accommodation in CAPF medical fitness standards.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant medical fitness BMI limit pregnancy Central Armed Police Forces

Genpact India Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Range 10, OSD, New Delhi & Anr.

09 Sep 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:6849-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed reassessment proceedings initiated beyond the prescribed limitation period, holding that the Supreme Court's Ashish Agarwal judgment does not mandate revival of unchallenged or concluded reassessments and that procedural safeguards under the Finance Act, 2021 must be complied with.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A Section 149 limitation