Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Sharookh Khan v. Indira Gandhi National Open University

10 Sep 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:7881

The Delhi High Court held that a candidate cannot retrospectively change subjects after degree completion and directed the University to implement safeguards to prevent such occurrences.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant subject change degree completion retrospective alteration university examination

Vineet Kumar Gupta v. Intec Capital Pvt. Ltd.

10 Sep 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:7628

The Delhi High Court held that summons issued to a director under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act cannot be quashed if the complaint contains sufficient averments of his responsibility for the company's business and cheque dishonour.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 141 Negotiable Instruments Act vicarious liability director liability

Heaven Lounge Pvt Ltd & Ors. v. State of GNCTD & Anr.

10 Sep 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:7525

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition upholding conviction and sentence under Section 138 N.I. Act against company directors for cheque dishonour, affirming vicarious liability and competence of SPA witness.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Dishonour of cheque Vicarious liability Directors liability

Adarsh Viklang Vikash Samiti v. New-Delhi Municipal Council

10 Sep 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:7019-DB

Delhi High Court upheld NDMC’s interim humanitarian decision permitting physically disabled persons to vend temporarily in no vending zones, without granting permanent rights or licenses.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant physically disabled vendors no hawking zone temporary vending permission Street Vendors Act 2014

D K Freight Carrier Proprietor Deepak Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

10 Sep 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:6952-DB

The Delhi High Court remanded the matter for fresh consideration of GST registration cancellation and revocation after the petitioner submitted documentary evidence of business existence and address change.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST registration Section 28 CGST Act amendment of registration principal place of business

Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Sakshi Shedha

10 Sep 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:7213-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order reinstating a candidate whose appointment as Architectural Assistant was cancelled without proper inquiry despite her declared qualification matching the advertisement criteria.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Appointment cancellation Misrepresentation Degree in Architecture Degree in Planning

Singh v. Soma Roy

10 Sep 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:7212-DB

The High Court upheld the Tribunal's order setting aside a delayed charge memo and suspension issued by an incompetent authority against a Medical Officer who was on leave during the alleged theft.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant charge memo disciplinary proceedings delay in initiation suspension order

I v. State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr.

10 Sep 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:7174
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging bail granted to an accused in a rape case, holding that bail cancellation requires cogent evidence of interference with justice or abuse of bail conditions.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant bail cancellation of bail rape Section 164 CrPC

Amit Chandi v. Aarti Chandi @ Aarti Khanna

10 Sep 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:7173

The Delhi High Court upheld maintenance and compensation awarded to a wife under Section 125 CrPC and the Domestic Violence Act, affirming the husband's obligation despite his extramarital cohabitation and the wife's earning capacity.

family petition_dismissed Significant maintenance Section 125 CrPC Domestic Violence Act extramarital relationship

Seema Asthana v. Jaideep Arora

10 Sep 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:7172
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed a complaint under Section 138 NI Act against a non-executive director due to lack of specific allegations of responsibility for the company’s business or involvement in the cheque transaction.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 138 NI Act non-executive director liability vicarious liability dishonoured cheque

Bhanu Pratap v. Babul

10 Sep 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:7106

The High Court set aside an ex parte possession recovery decree under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act for lack of impleadment of the government and violation of the right to be heard, remanding the matter for fresh trial.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 6 Specific Relief Act illegal dispossession limitation impleadment of government

INFINITI RETAIL LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

10 Sep 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:6951-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the adjudicating authority to independently consider the petitioner’s responses to the GST Show Cause Notice without relying solely on the audit report, ensuring procedural fairness in tax demand adjudication.

tax petition_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice Section 74 CGST Act audit report procedural fairness

Association of Power Producers v. Solar Energy Corporation of India Limited

10 Sep 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:6972-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking directions to clarify GST applicability on Battery Energy Storage Systems, holding that GST liability must be determined under statutory provisions and that the petition was belated and without merit.

administrative petition_dismissed Goods and Services Tax Battery Energy Storage Systems Request for Selection Tariff-Based Competitive Bidding

Jagmohan Lal & Anr. v. The Chairman TVC-NDMC & Ors.

10 Sep 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2017 SCC OnLine Del 8962
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

Delhi High Court directed NDMC to consider petitioners’ representation for alternative vending sites and issuance of LORs under the Street Vendors Act and PM SVANidhi scheme, while upholding the No-Vending Zone status pending fresh vending plan.

administrative other Significant Street Vendors Act 2014 No-Vending Zone PM SVANidhi scheme Letters of Recommendation

Prateek Aggarwal & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Anr

10 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:6948

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 528 BNSS matrimonial dispute amicable settlement

Ct. Amit @ Amit Kumar v. Govt of NCT of Delhi The SHO and Anr

10 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:6958

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279/337 IPC arising from a road accident due to amicable settlement and compensation paid, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR amicable settlement compounding of offence

Ashish Verma & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

10 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:6955

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 506, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court process.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 528 BNSS Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

KAIRA DISTRICT COOPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS UNION LTD & ANR. v. BIO LOGIC AND PSYCHOTROPICS INDIA PRIVATE LTD & ANR.

10 Sep 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:7078

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and awarded costs and damages to plaintiffs for infringement of their well-known trademark 'AMUL' by defendants using the same mark on pharmaceutical products.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement Well-known trademark Permanent injunction Passing off

Delhi Development Authority v. Vaibhav Malik & Ors.

10 Sep 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:7046-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal’s order holding that DDA’s fixation of 01.01.2022 as the eligibility date for LDCE was arbitrary and contrary to DoPT regulations prescribing 01.07, dismissing the petitioner’s writ petition.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Limited Departmental Competitive Examination Relevant date for eligibility Delhi Development Authority Department of Personnel and Training

MORINGO ORGANICS PRIVATE LIMITED v. MAREESOFT INFOTECH OPC PVT LTD & ORS

10 Sep 2024 · C. HARI SHANKAR · 2024:DHC:7029

The Delhi High Court referred the petition to the arbitral tribunal for adjudication under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, without expressing any opinion on merits, and maintained interim orders.

arbitration petition_dismissed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 17 Arbitral tribunal Interim orders