Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Badakulu Ladu @ Sushant v. State

11 Sep 2024 · Anish Dayal · 2024:DHC:7332
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner charged under Section 29 of the NDPS Act, holding that reliance solely on co-accused disclosures, CDRs, and monetary transactions without direct recovery is insufficient to deny bail, and procedural defects in sampling must be examined at trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act bail Section 52A sampling disclosure statement

Rupi Babbar v. State NCT of Delhi

11 Sep 2024 · Anish Dayal · 2024:DHC:7124

The Delhi High Court set aside charges against a mother under Section 21 POCSO for alleged failure to report child sexual abuse by her husband, holding that delay due to abuse and threats does not constitute failure to report.

criminal petition_allowed Significant POCSO Act Section 21 POCSO failure to report delay in reporting

Shankar Hirachand Kadam v. The State of NCT Delhi

11 Sep 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:7629

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail for a step-father accused of repeatedly raping his minor step-daughter, emphasizing the gravity of the offence, prima facie evidence, and the protective mandate of the POCSO Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail POCSO Act sexual assault rape

Geeta Gupta v. M/S Nivedan Fin Invest Lease Ltd

11 Sep 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:7630

The Delhi High Court held that Magistrates must conduct a mandatory inquiry under Section 202 CrPC before issuing summons in Section 138 NI Act complaints against accused residing outside their jurisdiction, and set aside summons issued without such inquiry.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 NI Act Section 202 CrPC Inquiry before summons Dishonour of cheque

Daihril David Hrailu v. Joint Recruitment Cell Lok Sabha Secretariat Parliament of India and Anr.

11 Sep 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:7557

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that a PwD reserved vacancy cannot be filled by a non-PwD ST candidate and must be carried forward if unfilled, upholding the recruitment rules and reservation principles.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant reservation PwD reservation ST category vertical reservation

Umesh v. Union of India & Anr.

11 Sep 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:7188-DB

The Delhi High Court held that GST registration cannot be cancelled solely on unsubstantiated oral statements and directed restoration of registration pending proper adjudication.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST registration Section 29 CGST Act Show Cause Notice physical verification

Antex Pharma Pvt Ltd v. Aadvik Pharma & Anr

11 Sep 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:7199-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against refusal of interim injunction in a trademark and passing off suit, holding that prima facie evaluation of defence is essential and exclusive rights cannot be claimed over a commonly used mark.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant interim injunction Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC copyright infringement passing off

Prakash Singh Bisht v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax

11 Sep 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:7202-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the retrospective cancellation of GST registration due to non-communication of reasons, restoring the petitioner’s registration and emphasizing adherence to natural justice principles.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST registration cancellation natural justice Show Cause Notice retrospective cancellation

Sadhna Kohli v. Sales Tax Officer Class II, Avato Ward 80 & Anr.

11 Sep 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:6993-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under the DGST Act due to non-receipt and inaccessibility of the Show Cause Notice, directing fresh adjudication after affording the petitioner a proper hearing.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice Delhi Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 73 DGST Act reasonable opportunity of hearing

Punjab and Sindh Bank v. Raj Kumar

11 Sep 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:7045-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the principle of parity in disciplinary punishments, converting the respondent's dismissal to compulsory retirement due to disproportionate and discriminatory treatment compared to co-delinquents.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Article 14 parity in punishment departmental inquiry dismissal from service

A.K. Pathak & Ors. v. New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr

11 Sep 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:7007-DB

The Delhi High Court directed NDMC to implement the Tribunal's pay scale order following the Supreme Court's dismissal of the appeal, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition Central Administrative Tribunal Time Bound Pay Scale pay scale benefits

ASI Sanjay Kumar v. Savita Devi

11 Sep 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:7047-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Government's appeal and upheld the CAT order directing release of gratuity and retiral dues to the widow of a deceased employee, holding that unauthorized absence periods already condoned cannot be recovered posthumously.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant no work no pay unauthorized absence gratuity government servant

Union of India & Anr. v. Vikas

11 Sep 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:6989-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order quashing the rejection of a candidate's candidature for violating non-cancellation examination instructions, emphasizing strict interpretation of examination rules.

administrative appeal_dismissed examination instructions cancellation of candidature Central Administrative Tribunal writ petition

Staff Selection Commission v. Rahul

11 Sep 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:7001-DB

The High Court directed a fresh medical examination by an independent medical board at a different hospital, holding its report final and binding, thereby modifying the Tribunal's order and ensuring fairness in recruitment medical fitness assessment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant medical examination recruitment Staff Selection Commission Central Administrative Tribunal

Raj Kumar Tiwari v. M/S ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. and Anr.

11 Sep 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:7023
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court directed the Insurance Ombudsman to treat the writ petition as a fresh complaint and decide the insurance claim dispute within four weeks, ensuring timely adjudication under Article 226.

administrative other Insurance claim Insurance Ombudsman Article 226 Writ petition

Bhooma Devi v. Janki Devi

11 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7034

The High Court granted the petitioner one final opportunity to complete cross-examination subject to costs, setting aside the Trial Court's refusal to adjourn.

civil appeal_allowed adjournment cross-examination civil suit trial court discretion

National Health Authority v. Ms. Neha Yadav, Advocate

11 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7033

The Delhi High Court allowed partial attachment of the judgment debtor's bank account limited to the decretal amount in execution of an arbitral award, modifying the order for attachment of the entire account.

civil petition_allowed arbitral award execution attachment of bank account decretal amount Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act

Ruby Sharma v. M/S Sood Resins and Polymers

11 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7032

The High Court held that partners of an LLP cannot be compelled to disclose personal assets in execution proceedings against the LLP without an opportunity of hearing, recalling such orders passed by the trial court.

civil petition_allowed Significant Limited Liability Partnership Execution Proceedings Asset Disclosure Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008

Kanchan Singh v. Bula Mukherjee & Ors.

11 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7031

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a writ petition challenging NCDRC order, holding that jurisdiction lies with the Calcutta High Court as the cause of action arose in West Bengal.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Article 226 jurisdiction National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Anita Goyal & Anr. v. Gagan Bhatnagar

11 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7030

The Delhi High Court restored defendants' defence in a commercial suit by deeming their written statement on record and imposed costs for delay, holding that summons must be duly served before striking off defence.

civil appeal_allowed service of summons written statement striking off defence commercial suit