Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Aditya Singh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Municipal Corporation's permission to install a mobile tower near residential and sensitive areas, holding no proven health hazards or legal violations.
Good Year Security Services R. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Sports Authority of India to decide the petitioner's representation challenging excessive tender eligibility criteria by a reasoned order within two days and stayed awarding the contract for one week.
AXCESS LIMITED v. CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal against the Controller's refusal of a patent application, holding that the amended claims were within the original scope and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
VIP Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd v. Rhydburg Pharmaceuticals Limited
The Delhi High Court rejected the plaintiff's suit as barred by law under CPC provisions for instituting a fresh suit on the same cause of action after withdrawing the earlier counter claim without liberty to sue afresh.
Yashika Malik v. University of Delhi Faculty of Medical Sciences & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the University of Delhi to allot a supernumerary medical admission seat to a meritorious candidate wrongly excluded due to administrative errors in verifying her Armed Forces reservation certificate.
Raman Raheja v. State of NCT of Delhi and Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the summoning order under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, ruling that disputed defenses and settlement validity must be examined at trial, not at the summoning stage.
Dr. Alka Aggarwal v. Nagma
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an interim order of the Central Administrative Tribunal allowing respondents to continue employment until the next hearing, holding that such interlocutory orders should not be interfered with by the High Court.
Devendra Kumar v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Ravi Dutt Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld the FIR registration against a police officer for obstructing a process server, ruling that prior sanction is not required at FIR stage when acts are beyond official duty and that the Magistrate has jurisdiction to direct such registration.
M/S KEYA FOODS v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
The Delhi High Court granted a four-month extension to the appellant to vacate the stall, aligning with the Supreme Court's order in a related case, and disposed of the appeal accordingly.
Central Board of Secondary Education v. St. Columbus School and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that natural justice does not always require a personal hearing before withdrawing school affiliation and allowed the appellant to re-inspect the school before passing a fresh order.
M/S KENT RO SYSTEMS LTD v. BRAND PROTECTORS INDIA PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court held that a party has the right to confront a witness with relevant documents during cross-examination even without prior disclosure of document details, allowing the appeal and setting aside the trial court's rejection of such application.
Munna v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held the Municipal Corporation liable for the death of a minor due to negligent maintenance of premises and awarded Rs. 10 lakhs compensation under writ jurisdiction invoking res ipsa loquitur.
Mr. N K Kantawal, Mr. Satyender Chahar, Mr. Chetan Singh, Ms. Amaya Nair, Ms. Pallak Singha and Ms. Sangeeta Gulati v. Raghav Goel & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's interim appeal challenging a trial court order restraining interference with the defendant's possession in a property access dispute, directing cooperation for expeditious trial.
Shri Nanak Chand v. Jeet Singh and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's discretion to condone delay in filing a written statement in a counter-claim, dismissing the petition for lack of glaring irregularity.
HERO REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a petition under Article 227 due to lack of territorial jurisdiction, directing the petitioner to approach the appropriate High Court as per the Supreme Court’s ruling.
Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-III v. Dalip Kumar Banthiya
The Delhi High Court held that interest under Section 234B of the Income Tax Act is payable only up to the admission of a settlement application under Section 245D(1), and the Settlement Commission cannot waive or extend interest liability beyond that date.
EX CHAA MOHAMMED ZULKARNAIN v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition upholding the Armed Forces Tribunal’s order rejecting the petitioner’s belated request to revoke his unwillingness for deputation and denying re-engagement or pension benefits, holding the claim barred by limitation and not covered by policy.
M/s TDI Infrastructure Ltd. v. Birjendra Singh Mallik Since Deceased Thr LR
The Delhi High Court held that petitions under Article 227 challenging NCDRC orders must be filed before the High Court where the original cause of action arose, not merely because the NCDRC is located in Delhi.
M/S PRADEEP VINOD CONSTRUCTION CO. v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court held that executing courts have jurisdiction under Section 47 CPC to rectify typographical errors in final arbitral awards and enforce them as decrees, dismissing objections based on misnaming of the decree holder.
Ms. Chetna Rani and Ors. v. National Capital Territory of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a recruitment notice replacing existing contractual nurses with new contractual employees, reaffirming that contractual staff cannot be arbitrarily replaced without regular recruitment as per Supreme Court precedent.