Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Tanveer Ahmed Mir et al. v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court granted bail to Amandeep Singh Dhall in a PMLA case, emphasizing the primacy of fundamental rights and the twin conditions under Section 45 PMLA, while imposing stringent conditions to safeguard the investigation.
Amit Arora v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a seriously ill accused under PMLA, emphasizing the primacy of the right to health and liberty under Article 21 over statutory bail restrictions.
Ziaul Haque & Ors. v. Delhi Development Authority & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that displaced Jhuggie dwellers who prove residential status and meet DDA policy criteria are entitled to rehabilitation despite allegations of incidental commercial use, setting aside the denial based on insufficient evidence.
Rajeshwar Nath Gupta & Others v. Ashok Jain & Others
The Delhi High Court held that a leasehold property conveyed as undivided shares under a perpetual lease deed cannot be physically partitioned without permission, and restrained unilateral partition attempts by injunction.
Amit Katyal v. Directorate of Enforcement Government of India
Delhi High Court granted regular bail to petitioner accused under PMLA, holding that the value of proceeds involved was below Rs. 1 crore exempting him from twin test and considering his medical condition and cooperation with investigation.
FUJIFILM INDIA PVT. LTD v. MACART EQUIPMENT PVT. LTD
The Delhi High Court extended the arbitrator's mandate by one year under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, allowing continuation of arbitration proceedings and permitting the respondent to seek recall of claimant’s witnesses.
MIS. TATA ALDESA (JV) v. MIS. DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to extend the arbitrator's mandate by six months under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with no objection from the respondent.
The State of NCT of Delhi v. Shyam Kishore Alias Putan
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a POCSO sexual assault case due to lack of medical evidence, failure of victim to identify the accused, and inconsistencies in testimony.
Mrs. Arti Gupta & Anr. v. Puran Rana & Anr.
The Delhi High Court cancelled the respondent's trademark registration for "KONVIO NEER" due to dishonest adoption and deceptive similarity with the petitioner's prior registered marks, upholding the petitioners' exclusive rights under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Kunal Food Products Pvt. Ltd. v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the denial of pre-reference and pendente lite interest in an arbitration award, holding that the arbitrator's decision was neither perverse nor patently illegal.
Surender Gupta and Anr v. Rajat Wadhwa
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the execution order related to transfer charges, emphasizing the pendency of a Section 34 arbitration petition and directing parties to pursue remedies as per law.
Satish Gupta v. Rachna Gupta and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for injunction over disputed property ownership and possession, emphasizing the necessity of a declaratory suit when title is under cloud and denying relief due to concealment of material facts.
Hari Ram v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in an NDPS case holding that separate quantities of contraband cannot be aggregated to invoke the bar on bail under Section 37 and that mere traveling together does not establish abetment under Section 29.
M/S. BRAINZTORM TECHNICAL EXCELLENCE v. M/S. V-CONNECT SYSTEMS AND SERVICES PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of defendants' application challenging pre-institution mediation jurisdiction, holding that non-participation despite notice does not invalidate the mediation or suit.
Parkwood Developers Private Limited v. Hardesh Mehta
Delhi High Court held that jurisdiction to challenge NCDRC orders lies with the High Court of the territorial jurisdiction where the cause of action arose and allowed withdrawal of petition with liberty to approach the appropriate High Court.
Baby Aayat (Minor) v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that EWS/DG admission eligibility is restricted to parents/legal guardians and rejected admission claims based on grandparents’ documents, dismissing the appeal.
Kailash Harijan v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition for production of missing persons after they were traced and directed medical treatment for the mentally disturbed daughter.
Master Arnesh Shaw v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed pharmaceutical companies and the government to ensure transparent pricing, adequate distribution, and timely funding for medicines treating rare diseases, upholding patients' right to health.
Harish Singla v. Ministry of External Affairs
The Delhi High Court quashed the Look-Out Circular against a former company director, holding that issuance of LOCs must comply with procedural safeguards and cannot be imposed mechanically without evidence of evasion or non-cooperation.
M/S AUSIL CORPORATION PVT. LTD v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court quashed the detention of imported platinum alloy sheets and the imposition of security without recorded reasons or proper verification under Section 28DA of the Customs Act, CAROTAR, and CEPA Rules, emphasizing the necessity of reasoned administrative action.