Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Ms. Neha Yadav, Advocate and SI Vikash Kumar v. Bhupendra Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging medical disqualification due to tattoo after the candidate removed the tattoo, directing his admission to police training.
SGS India Private Limited v. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court directed the appointed arbitrator to decide the petition as an application under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, while maintaining the interim order until further orders.
Rollz India Waste Management Pvt Ltd v. Pan India Infra Projects Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that insolvency proceedings against a respondent do not bar the Commercial Court from ordering release of a fixed deposit deposited as security in arbitration proceedings when the respondent has withdrawn its claim.
CELEBI DELHI CARGO TERMINAL MANAGEMENT INDIA PVT. LTD. v. SALES TAX OFFICER, NEW DELHI
The Delhi High Court remanded a GST tax demand order for fresh consideration due to a technical glitch in the GST portal affecting output tax liability reconciliation.
Abhishek Grover v. Divisional Commissioner Delhi
The Delhi High Court restored the eviction order against a son for ill-treating senior citizen parents under the Senior Citizens Act, holding that summary eviction does not require conclusive ownership proof and that appellate interference must be reasoned.
Jagmohan Chaudhary v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that injuries sustained during official training constitute 'active government duty' entitling the petitioner to medical category relaxation and promotion benefits under Standing Order 04/2008.
ATC Telecom Infrastructure Pvt Ltd v. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal directing the Single Judge to consider all grounds of challenge in the Section 34 petition and condoned the delay in filing the appeal.
Jain Irrigation Systems Limited v. M/S. Pragyawan Technologies Private Limited
Delhi High Court lacks territorial jurisdiction to entertain suit against defendant with subordinate office and cause of action in Noida despite registered office in Delhi and exclusive jurisdiction clause; plaint returned under Order VII Rule 10 CPC.
Aditya Goel v. Joginder Singh & Ors.
The High Court set aside a First Appellate Court order that summarily allowed an appeal without notice, emphasizing the necessity of hearing all parties before disposing of appeals affecting interim injunctions.
Rajneesh Kumar Rathore v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that Indian courts cannot order release or extradition of an Indian citizen detained abroad but directed continued consular support and allowed family representations to the MEA.
Omwati v. Dayanand Thr Lrs
The High Court directed the Trial Court to re-summon a witness and allowed coercive process if the witness fails to appear, ensuring speedy disposal of a long-pending civil suit.
Sahay v. D. Sargurunathan
Delhi High Court dismissed petition for lack of territorial jurisdiction, allowing withdrawal with liberty to approach the appropriate High Court as per Supreme Court precedent.
Deepanshu Sharma & Anr. v. Vikrant Tyagi
The Delhi High Court allowed defendants conditional leave to defend a summary suit upon timely deposit of security and filing of written statement, emphasizing strict compliance with court directions.
Sharda v. Rahul Gupta
The court held that photographs from digital devices can be used to confront a witness only if accompanied by a certificate under Section 63 of the Indian Evidence Act, allowing the petitioner to re-confront the witness upon compliance.
Anamika Sarkar v. Surender Kumar
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s request to enhance physical visitation rights from once to twice a week by consent, maintaining existing video call arrangements.
Uma and Ors v. Renu Kumari and Ors
The Delhi High Court recalled the Trial Court's order closing the defendants' right to file a written statement for non-payment of cost, allowing them to pay the cost and file the statement within a stipulated time in the interest of justice.
Mr. Nitin Kumar and Ms. Sagarika Kaul v. Smt Sandhya Gupta and Ors
The Delhi High Court allowed the tenant's petition to file additional affidavits amending leave to defend applications and directed expeditious disposal of the eviction proceedings under bona fide requirement ground.
Mr. Manish Vashist v. Chainsukh Ujjwal
The Delhi High Court directed a fresh medical examination by an independent Medical Board for a provisionally selected candidate declared medically unfit, holding the Board's report final and binding to ensure fairness.
Sunil Kalra and Ors v. Vikas Gupta and Ors
The Delhi High Court allowed tenants to amend their leave to defend applications in eviction proceedings and directed expeditious disposal by the Rent Controller, emphasizing procedural fairness and timely adjudication.
Adnan Nisar v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court held that offences under foreign laws corresponding to scheduled offences with cross border implications fall within PMLA's ambit, validating ED's investigation and arrest based on an MLA request, and denied bail to accused involved in cryptocurrency fraud.