Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Omirico Limited & Anr. v. PJSC Sberbank & Anr.

18 Sep 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:7242

The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit seeking enforcement of a foreign Mareva Injunction against assets situated in Russia, holding that mere presence of defendant's branches in India does not confer jurisdiction.

civil appeal_dismissed Mareva Injunction territorial jurisdiction foreign court orders enforcement of injunction

Shumita Sandhu v. Tani Sandhu Bhargava

18 Sep 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:7210

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for partition of property held individually by Late Mrs. Sheila Sandhu, affirming that the property is not HUF property and upholding the earlier decree directing possession in favor of defendant No.1.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant partition suit Hindu Undivided Family property absolute ownership Section 14 Hindu Succession Act

Sunil Kumar Khunteta v. Ashok Chaudhary & Anr.

18 Sep 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:7140
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's amendment application to include an alternate claim for recovery of unpaid sale consideration without changing the nature of the suit or violating limitation principles.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VI Rule 17 CPC amendment of plaint Agreement to Sell recovery of sale consideration

Shuchi Sharma v. State of NCT of Delhi

18 Sep 2024 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:7303

The Delhi High Court granted Letters of Administration to the petitioner, a Class-I legal heir and natural guardian, for the estate of her intestate deceased husband, subject to recovery rights of secured creditors.

civil petition_allowed Letters of Administration Indian Succession Act, 1925 Class-I legal heirs intestate succession

R L Enterprises v. Commissioner State Goods and Services Tax Delhi & Anr.

18 Sep 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:7132-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an order denying Input Tax Credit for non-consideration of evidence and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication under the CGST Act.

tax appeal_allowed Input Tax Credit CGST Act 2017 SGST Act 2017 Section 73

Ms Khukhrain Builders & Ors. v. Indian Bank & Ors.

18 Sep 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:7297
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition of MSME borrowers for belated invocation of MSMED Act protections and failure to exhaust statutory remedies under SARFAESI Act and RBI Framework.

civil petition_dismissed Significant MSME SARFAESI Act MSMED Act Non-Performing Asset

Pet Educational Industries Pvt Ltd v. Arpit Kapur

18 Sep 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:7370-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of a civil appeal by recording a settlement between the parties with directions for payment and compliance affidavits.

civil appeal_allowed settlement appeal disposal affidavit undertaking payment schedule

Ajit Kumar & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr

18 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7135

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC

Rahul @ Sumit v. State (NCT of Delhi)

18 Sep 2024 · Anish Dayal · 2024:DHC:7221

The Delhi High Court granted bail to accused in a kidnapping for ransom case emphasizing the right to speedy trial and lack of direct identification despite serious charges.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail kidnapping for ransom Section 364A IPC right to speedy trial

Sandeep Sharma v. Vikram Kumar Pandey

18 Sep 2024 · Anish Dayal · 2024:DHC:7223
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a complaint under Section 138 NI Act filed through a Special Power of Attorney is valid if ratified subsequently, and authorization issues are to be tried during trial, not at the cognizance stage.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Special Power of Attorney Ratification Section 482 Cr.P.C.

Rasayanam Enterprises v. Upakarma Ayurveda Pvt. Ltd.

18 Sep 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:7131-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction restraining the appellant's 20 gm product packaging as deceptively similar to the respondent's registered trademark, emphasizing the overall impression test for likelihood of confusion in trademark infringement and passing off cases.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant trademark infringement passing off interim injunction trade dress

Hira Khatoon v. Union of India and Ors.

18 Sep 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:7139

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging AMU's actions on grounds of lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that the cause of action arose entirely in Uttar Pradesh.

constitutional petition_dismissed territorial jurisdiction Article 226 forum conveniens University Grants Commission Act, 1956

Chamanpreet Singh v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

18 Sep 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:7267

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 25 of the Arms Act against a petitioner who unknowingly carried a live cartridge in a borrowed bag, holding that conscious possession is essential for criminal liability.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 25 Arms Act 1959 conscious possession mens rea quashing of FIR

Narendra Surana v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

18 Sep 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:7170

The Delhi High Court set aside a bail order directing prior notice before arrest, holding that courts cannot impose such conditions under Section 482 BNSS as it unlawfully restricts the investigating agency's statutory arrest powers.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant pre-arrest bail Section 482 BNSS prior notice before arrest handwriting verification

Deepak @ Tutan @ Bharat Sharma v. State of NCT of Delhi

18 Sep 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:7508
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused charged with murder, holding that serious prima facie evidence and the special status of injured eyewitness testimony outweigh prolonged incarceration in bail considerations.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail application Section 302 IPC injured eyewitness testimony prima facie case

Ranjeet Singh v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

18 Sep 2024 · Anish Dayal · 2024:DHC:7183
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 376 and 506 IPC based on the prosecutrix's voluntary statement of consensual relationship and refusal to proceed, applying inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. in light of relevant Supreme Court precedents.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 376 IPC quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC consensual relationship

Krishna Kanhaiya and Ors v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr

18 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7239

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of the court's process.

criminal appeal_allowed Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

Noor Afshan v. Shiv Lock House & Others

18 Sep 2024 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:7116

The Delhi High Court dismissed the belated application for substitution of the deceased plaintiff's son, holding the suit abated due to non-prosecution and unexplained delay in complying with procedural requirements.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant substitution of plaintiff Order XII Rule 10 CPC Order XII Rule 3 CPC abatement of suit

POLOTRIPS INDIA PVT. LTD. & ANR. v. KARNATAKA BANK LIMITED & ORS.

18 Sep 2024 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:7154

The Delhi High Court held that it lacks territorial jurisdiction to entertain a suit for specific performance relating to immovable property situated in Haryana, mandating the suit be filed in the Court where the property is located.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 16 CPC territorial jurisdiction specific performance immovable property

Staff Selection Commission & Ors. v. Bheemsan

18 Sep 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:7233-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a re-medical examination by a specialized Medical Board with full disclosure of medical history, declaring the Board's report final and binding for determining the respondent's fitness for police appointment.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant medical fitness re-medical examination Central Administrative Tribunal Staff Selection Commission