Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
MD Sadab & Anr. v. Mehtab Ahmad Saifi
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's closure of defendants' right to lead evidence due to repeated non-appearance and non-payment of costs, affirming limited interference under Article 227.
Nitish Taneja v. Ayushi Arora
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Family Court's refusal to grant early hearing in a maintenance case, emphasizing limited interference under Article 227.
Shantivijay Jewellers v. M/S Goyal Modes
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of defendants' application to examine an additional witness after closure of evidence in a 26-year-old recovery suit, emphasizing procedural finality and expeditious disposal.
Sh. Rishi Kumar v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted letters of administration under Section 228 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 based on an authenticated copy of a Will already proved and probated by a competent court, allowing administration of estate properties beyond territorial limits.
Staff Selection Commission and Ors. v. Teekam Singh Meena
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's direction for a re-medical examination of the respondent by an independent medical board, with the report to be final and binding, ensuring fairness in the recruitment process.
Navita Arjun Vohra v. Nitin Arjun & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff to amend her Evidence by way of Affidavit to correct factual inaccuracies discovered through RTI, holding that such amendments are permissible under Section 151 CPC and do not cause prejudice if the opposing party is allowed cross-examination.
M/S GURU EXIM v. INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK & ANR
The Delhi High Court held that an interim status quo order on a bank account does not restrain recovery proceedings under the SARFAESI Act and allowed the bank to continue recovery while reserving the amount corresponding to goods supplied.
Ankur Kumar v. Central Bureau of Investigation and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the Central Administrative Tribunal's order granting extension of time to file counter reply and imposed costs, holding that judicial interference in such interlocutory orders is unwarranted.
Govind Ram v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a 64-year-old accused charged under the POCSO Act and IPC, holding that the presumption of guilt under Section 29 POCSO is rebuttable and bail cannot be denied solely on the seriousness of the offence or unsubstantiated allegations.
Aditya Goel v. Joginder Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court corrected typographical errors in a previous order regarding the court's designation and date of appearance by issuing a corrigendum.
Pramod Kumar Jain v. The Vice Chairman Delhi Development Authority and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the DDA to treat the writ petition as the final representation and pass a reasoned order on the petitioner’s claim for possession of a garage in a time-bound manner.
Disruptive Health Solutions Private Limited v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the assignment of a loan account to an asset reconstruction company, holding that MSME protections must be invoked timely and such assignments are not challengeable in writ proceedings.
Shanu Khan v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a rape case considering delay in complaint, victim’s conduct, possibility of false implication, and prolonged trial despite the serious nature of the offence.
Ved Prakash v. Neeraj Saxena
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's discretion in dismissing summary judgment under Order XII Rule 6 CPC due to disputed admissions and evidence in a landlord-tenant eviction suit.
Aviral Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed a stalking and outraging modesty FIR as malicious and unsupported by evidence, applying Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.
Ms. Saumya Jain and Mr. Yaksh Garg v. Reckon Industries Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's refusal to compel production of audit reports and summoning of the plaintiff's Chartered Accountant in a suit limited to the issue of the date from which interest is payable.
City Clinic Pvt Ltd v. Makino International Healthcare Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court restored the defendant's defense and granted 30 days to file the written statement due to non-supply of plaint by electronic mode, imposing costs for delay.
Munish Jain v. Shikha Jain
The Delhi High Court allowed appeals by disposing them on a comprehensive consent settlement involving maintenance, property transfer, and mutual divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act.
Ms. Pragya Barsaiyan; Ms. Anandita Rana; Ms. Vanshita Rana v. Indu Aggarwal
The Delhi High Court reduced the cost imposed for recalling an ex-parte order to enable cross-examination, directing prompt compliance to avoid delay in a recovery suit.
Modern Mold Plast Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Flipkart Internet Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that unauthorized sellers latching onto plaintiffs' listings on Flipkart and selling non-genuine products infringe trademark rights, directing Flipkart to implement brand gating to prevent such misuse.