Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Suman Kumar v. Commissioner of Police, Delhi Police and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a petition seeking police investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC, holding that allegations of fraudulent loan deductions amounted to a contractual dispute not warranting FIR registration.
M/S HRC INTERNATIONAL v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration without proper hearing violates natural justice and modified the cancellation order to be effective from the date of suspension.
Parmod Kumar v. Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 33(1)(a) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, an employer cannot terminate or alter the service conditions of a workman to his prejudice during the pendency of industrial dispute proceedings and directed maintenance of status quo in the petitioner's employment.
Mukesh Kumar Nimesh & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court process.
Designarch Consultants Pvt Ltd and Anr v. Jumeirah Beach Resort LLC
The Delhi High Court disposed of cross-appeals in a trademark dispute between Jumeirah and Designarch by recording a settlement that recognized respective trademark ownerships and imposed mutual restrictions and withdrawals of related proceedings.
Avni Jain v. Abhishek Garg
The Delhi High Court upheld an interim maintenance order of ₹75,000 per month, ruling that maintenance under Section 125 CrPC aims to prevent destitution and does not require equalizing foreign income with Indian rupees.
Mr. Atul Kharbanda v. Institute of Psychic and Spiritual Research
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to set aside ex parte proceedings against defendants not served by ordinary process before substituted service, permitting them to participate in the suit.
Raheja Developers Limited v. Bhuwan Chopra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition challenging non-bailable warrants against a company's Managing Director, emphasizing the moratorium under the Insolvency Code and directors' non-personal liability in execution proceedings.
JK Cement Limited v. Ankur Agarwal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted ex parte permanent injunction to JK Cement Ltd. restraining defendants from using deceptively similar 'J&K' trademark and trade dress, emphasizing protection of registered trademarks and expeditious disposal under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC.
Hyatt International Southwest Asia Ltd v. Additional Director of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court held that profits attributable to a Permanent Establishment in India must be determined independently of the enterprise's global profit or loss, affirming taxability under Article 7 of the DTAA even when the enterprise incurs a global loss.
Prakash Godbhole v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Investigating Officer to provide reasonable notice to the petitioner, a government servant residing outside Delhi, to prevent harassment during investigation under Sections 420, 468, 471, and 120B IPC.
Amandeep Gill & Anr v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that cognizance under Section 174-A IPC requires a written complaint by the concerned public servant under Section 195(1)(a)(i) Cr.P.C., setting aside prior contrary rulings and quashing charges framed without such complaint.
Siddharth Talwar & Ors. v. Sarika Talwar
The Delhi High Court upheld interim maintenance orders granted to the wife and minor daughter under the Domestic Violence Act, refusing to interfere with concurrent findings of fact on the husband’s financial capacity and rejecting his challenge based on alleged unemployment and passport issues.
Arun Kumar Gupta v. Tama Jawahar
The Delhi High Court set aside the acquittal in a cheque dishonour case, holding that the respondent failed to rebut the statutory presumption under Section 139 NI Act that the cheques were issued for discharge of a legally enforceable debt evidenced by a valid MoU.
InterDigital Technology Corporation & Ors. v. Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd. & Ors.
Delhi High Court directs full disclosure of patent license agreements to defendants' in-house employees within a Confidentiality Club, subject to confidentiality safeguards, to enable proper FRAND assessment and defense in SEP infringement suits.
Jaspal Singh v. Rajender Paul Vermani
The Delhi High Court granted the defendant a final opportunity to cross-examine the plaintiff's witness and lead evidence subject to payment of costs and adherence to time-bound directions, emphasizing the Court's discretionary power to balance procedural compliance and fair trial.
Shri Manish Sharma v. Anita Luthra & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the 120-day statutory time limit for filing written statements in commercial suits is mandatory and cannot be extended, dismissing the petition filed for condonation of a one-day delay.
MS Sumana Dutta (Paul) v. The Chief Executive Officer, M/S Bharti Airtel Ltd, Kolkata
The Delhi High Court held that jurisdiction under Article 227 lies with the High Court where the cause of action arises and permitted withdrawal of the petition with liberty to approach the Calcutta High Court.
Ashu Sharma & Anr. v. Framework Interiors
The Delhi High Court held that directors of a judgment debtor company cannot be coercively punished in execution proceedings absent justifiable reasons and that the company cannot evade execution by relying on a sale proclamation from separate recovery proceedings.
PARKWOOD DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. v. SANJEEV KUMAR BANOTRA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that it lacks jurisdiction to entertain a petition under Article 227 challenging an NCDRC order when the cause of action arose outside Delhi, allowing withdrawal with liberty to approach the correct High Court.