Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Satbir v. State GNCTD

20 Sep 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:7256
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's finding that the petitioner was above 18 years on the date of the incident based on ossification tests of multiple joints, rejecting the application of a two-year margin of error and discretionary benefit under juvenile justice rules.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant ossification test juvenile determination margin of error juvenile justice rules

Atul Pundhir v. M/S The Delhi Group & Anr.

20 Sep 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:7251

The High Court upheld the acquittal in a Section 138 NI Act case, holding that the accused successfully rebutted statutory presumptions and the complainant failed to prove the existence of a legally enforceable debt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 NI Act presumption of debt rebuttal of presumption

Union of India & Ors. v. Yogesh Kumar

20 Sep 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:7296-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order allowing a railway employee's promotion despite initial absence of medical examination in the required category, emphasizing re-examination provisions and non-arbitrariness in departmental recruitment.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant medical fitness Aye-Two medical category Indian Railway Medical Manual departmental promotion

Kamran and Others v. State of N.C.T. of Delhi and Another

20 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7259

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34, 506 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act following an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of the court process.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Dowry Prohibition Act amicable settlement

Yusuf v. State Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi

20 Sep 2024 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2024:DHC:7385

The Delhi High Court set aside the appellant's conviction under Section 394 IPC due to lack of proper identification and insufficient evidence linking him to the robbery.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant robbery Section 394 IPC identification of accused recovery of weapon

Kunal Alias Harsh v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)

20 Sep 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:7252

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's framing of charges under Section 307 IPC against the petitioner, holding that a prima facie case existed based on the material on record and that detailed evidence evaluation is not required at the charge framing stage.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant framing of charge Section 307 IPC prima facie case intention to cause death

Arasdeep Singh v. State GNCT Delhi

20 Sep 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:7391

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 25 of the Arms Act against a petitioner where a single live cartridge was recovered without evidence of conscious possession or criminal intent.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 25 Arms Act 1959 conscious possession live cartridge quashing of FIR

Rajaram v. State of NCT of Delhi

20 Sep 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court modified the appellants' conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II IPC, holding the death occurred in a sudden fight without premeditation or intention to cause death.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part II IPC culpable homicide murder

Naval Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

20 Sep 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:7440-DB

The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition does not lapse if possession is taken and compensation paid, and claims for enhanced compensation must be pursued under the Land Acquisition Act, dismissing the petitioner’s writ petition.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition Section 24(2) RTFCTLARR Act 2013 possession compensation

Praveen Kumar Kasana & Ors. v. The State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) & Anr.

20 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7270

The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs involving minor offences arising from a family dispute after amicable settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR amicable settlement inherent powers

Shraddha Shandilyayan v. Livecities Media Private Limited & Ors.

20 Sep 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:7580
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court corrected a typographical error in the final order regarding the date of filing an application for condonation of delay but declined to entertain substantive challenges to the validity of the Written Statement filing under Sections 151 and 152 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Section 151 CPC Section 152 CPC correction of typographical error condonation of delay

Ujjwal Garg v. Commissioner, Department of Trade and Taxes, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

20 Sep 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:7379-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing restoration of the petitioner’s GST registration upon compliance with Rule 86B, holding that suspension cannot be maintained on unalleged grounds.

tax petition_allowed Significant GST registration Rule 86B CGST Rules input tax credit Show Cause Notice

T C Verma & Anr. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi

20 Sep 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:7331

The Delhi High Court held that the three-month limitation for appeals under Section 17 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 is mandatory and the Appellate Authority cannot condone delay under the Limitation Act, quashing the impugned order and directing implementation of the Forest Settlement Officer's land exchange order.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Indian Forest Act, 1927 Section 17 limitation condonation of delay Limitation Act, 1963

Rahul Vijayvargia v. The State of Delhi and Ors.

19 Sep 2024 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2024:DHC:7248

The Delhi High Court quashed the complaint against an Additional Independent Non-Executive Director who resigned before cheque dishonour, holding that mere directorship without control does not attract liability under the NI Act.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 NI Act Section 141 NI Act Director liability

Punjab National Bank v. Kartar Singh

19 Sep 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:7333-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's modification of dismissal punishment to stoppage of increments with reinstatement, but limited back wages entitlement to 50% based on 'no work no pay' principle.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act Section 11 dismissal from service punishment modification

Ravi Kumar v. Jain Cooperative Bank Ltd.

19 Sep 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:7203

The Delhi High Court held that disciplinary action disputes against cooperative society employees are excepted from the bar under Section 70(1)(b) of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003, affirming concurrent jurisdiction of Labour Courts and remanding the matter for fresh adjudication.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003 Section 70(1)(b) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 disciplinary action

IQ City Medical College v. National Medical Commission & Ors.

19 Sep 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:7276

Delhi High Court quashed NMC's denial of increase in MBBS seats for IQ City Medical College, holding that average deliveries are irrelevant and faculty deficiencies were within permissible limits under UG-MSR 2023.

administrative petition_allowed Significant National Medical Commission Medical Assessment and Rating Board Increase of MBBS seats UG-MSR 2023

GE Nuovo Pignone S.P.A v. Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation), Delhi - I & Anr.

19 Sep 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja

The Delhi High Court upheld reassessment under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2009-10, affirming the existence of Fixed Place and Dependent Agent Permanent Establishments of GE Nuovo Pignone in India and the consequent profit attribution under the DTAA.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Permanent Establishment Dependent Agent PE Fixed Place PE Section 147 Income Tax Act

Dagar v. Union of India & Ors.

19 Sep 2024 · Rekha Palli; Shalinder Kaur

The Delhi High Court held that senior RPF officers denied ACP benefits despite two promotions are entitled to pay parity with juniors who availed one promotion, directing retrospective pay upgradation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Assured Career Progression Scheme Limited Departmental Competitive Examination pay parity seniority

M/S ANIL SHARMA AND SONS v. M/S NATIONAL SMALL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION LTD

19 Sep 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal

The Delhi High Court clarified that in a recovery suit, issues of equitable mortgage and guarantor liability cannot be framed against a party not standing as guarantor or party to the settlement, and deleted such issues while affirming others related to cause of action and privity of contract.

civil appeal_allowed Significant recovery suit equitable mortgage guarantor liability settlement agreement