Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Mandeep Kaur v. Directorate of Education & Ors.

20 Sep 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:7736

The Delhi High Court held that recognized private unaided minority schools are statutorily bound under Section 10(1) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 to implement 6th and 7th CPC pay revisions and benefits at par with government schools, directing payment of arrears with interest.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Delhi School Education Act, 1973 Section 10(1) 6th Central Pay Commission 7th Central Pay Commission

Gaurav Singh v. Sitaram

20 Sep 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:7581
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's dismissal of the application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that possession disputes based on unregistered documents are triable issues not decidable at the threshold.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC rejection of plaint cause of action possession

Bala Rani Bhatia v. Directorate of Education & Ors.

20 Sep 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:7735
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that recognized private unaided minority schools are statutorily bound under Section 10(1) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 to pay their employees salaries and benefits at par with government employees as per 6th and 7th Central Pay Commissions, directing release of arrears and benefits accordingly.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Delhi School Education Act, 1973 Section 10(1) Central Pay Commission 6th CPC

BIOTYX MEDICAL (SHENZHEN) CO. LTD v. THE ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS

20 Sep 2024 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:7217

Delhi High Court sets aside patent refusal for an absorbable iron-based alloy medical device, directing reconsideration of inventive step with proper scientific reasoning and methodology.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Patent Act 1970 novelty inventive step zinc-containing protector

MD Wazid Raza v. Superintendent Range-108 Central Goods and Service Tax & Anr.

20 Sep 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:7260-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the tax authorities to allow the petitioner an opportunity to submit documents before deciding on cancellation of his GST registration following suspension due to alleged non-existence at the declared business address.

administrative other GST registration Show Cause Notice cancellation of registration physical verification

Mohd. Shahzad v. New Delhi Municipal Council

20 Sep 2024 · Vibhu BakhrU; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:7229-DB

The Delhi High Court held that no vending rights can be transmitted to legal heirs if the deceased did not hold a valid license during lifetime, dismissing the petition for transfer of tehbazari rights posthumously.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant tehbazari rights street vending legal heirs license transfer

Mayank Bansal v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

20 Sep 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:7255

The Delhi High Court set aside charges against the petitioner for lack of prima facie material linking him to the offence, emphasizing that mere presence without overt acts or common intention cannot attract liability under Section 34 IPC at the charge framing stage.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant framing of charge Section 307 IPC Section 34 IPC prima facie case

Sushila Goel v. Government of NCT of Delhi

20 Sep 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta

The Delhi High Court held that petitioners compensated for agricultural land allotted in lieu under consolidation proceedings cannot claim compensation for the original subject land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, affirming finality of the consolidation scheme and dismissing their petitions.

property petition_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Consolidation Scheme Sections 30-31 LA Act Compensation claim

Swati Maliwal v. State; Sarika Chaudhary v. State

20 Sep 2024 · Amit Mahajan

The Delhi High Court upheld framing of charges against accused for criminal misconduct involving arbitrary appointments and misuse of public funds at DCW, emphasizing the sufficiency of prima facie material at the charge stage.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant framing of charge Prevention of Corruption Act Delhi Commission for Women General Financial Rules

Someshwar Dayal v. Anupama Dayal

20 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7298

The Delhi High Court held that a party in a civil suit cannot be denied the right to address oral arguments merely because the case is old, directing the trial court to allow the defendant to present oral arguments.

civil petition_allowed Significant oral arguments right to be heard civil suit adjournment

Shree Balaji Laminations v. SR Goyal Polymers

20 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7299

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order allowing amendment of the plaint and impleadment of the true proprietor, dismissing the petition challenging the same.

civil petition_dismissed amendment of plaint impleadment of parties Order VI Rule 17 CPC Order I Rule 10 CPC

Shukla Chakraborty v. Snehanshu Das Pandit

20 Sep 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:7254

The Delhi High Court upheld maintenance of ₹12,000 per month but set aside the show-cause notice under Section 340 CrPC against the petitioner, emphasizing judicial discretion and preventing misuse of false evidence proceedings in matrimonial disputes.

family petition_partly_allowed Significant maintenance under Section 125 CrPC Section 340 CrPC inquiry false evidence prosecution matrimonial disputes

Nawal Kishore Khandelwal v. Anuradha & Ors.

20 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7300

The High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the petition challenging dismissal of an Order VII Rule 11 application with liberty to raise issues at trial and directed expeditious disposal of the suit.

civil petition_dismissed Order VII Rule 11 CPC dismissal of plaint withdrawal of petition reservation of rights

Babita Devi v. Ram Kripal Mall

20 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7302

The High Court directed the Trial Court to prioritize hearing the petitioner's interim injunction application to protect possession and business interests amid urgent demolition threat.

civil other interim injunction mandatory injunction possession priority hearing

Anil Kulshrestha v. M/S FIITJEE Ltd.

20 Sep 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:7253

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash summons under Section 138 NI Act, holding that factual disputes regarding security cheques and contract validity must be tried and cannot be decided at the pre-trial stage.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act security cheque quashing order Section 482 CrPC

Manish v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

20 Sep 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:7257
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's maintenance award to the wife under Section 125 CrPC, affirming her entitlement due to sufficient cause for living separately and reasonable income assessment of the husband.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Section 125 CrPC maintenance wife reasonable cause

Bharat Bhushan & Others v. Atul Gupta

20 Sep 2024 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:7322

The Delhi High Court allowed the tenant's revision petition, setting aside the eviction order and granting leave to defend, holding that sale of other shops shortly before eviction raises triable issues on bona fide requirement under the Delhi Rent Control Act.

property appeal_allowed Significant bona fide requirement eviction petition Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 leave to defend

Swarn Nijhawan and Others v. M/s G.D. Seigell & Co. Pvt. Ltd.

20 Sep 2024 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:7323

The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of the tenant on the landlord's bona fide requirement under the Delhi Rent Control Act, dismissing tenant's plea for leave to defend due to lack of triable issues.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 eviction bona fide requirement leave to defend

Mohd Nasir and Ors. v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

20 Sep 2024 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2024:DHC:7250
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of appellants for grievous injuries under Sections 308, 326, and 34 IPC, affirming that reliable ocular and medical evidence sufficed despite non-recovery of the weapon.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 308 IPC grievous injury culpable homicide not amounting to murder ocular evidence

Vivek Jatin Chaudhary v. Deepti Ture

20 Sep 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:7869

The Delhi High Court upheld the interim maintenance order but remanded the matter to reconsider arrears by accounting for the petitioner's income variance over the relevant years.

family appeal_allowed Significant interim maintenance Section 125 CrPC income assessment arrears of maintenance