Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Sangeeta Chadha v. New India Color Company Limited

24 Sep 2024 · Subramonium Prasad
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed the complaint against petitioners arrayed as managers of a company for cheque dishonour, holding that mere designation without specific averments of control and responsibility does not attract liability under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 141 Negotiable Instruments Act vicarious liability dishonour of cheque manager liability

WEST WIND ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. v. RAJESH MEDIRATTA

24 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7428

The High Court reduced the cost imposed on the petitioner for recall of cross-examination closure, emphasizing reasonable costs and cooperation to avoid trial delays.

civil petition_dismissed cross-examination cost imposition recall of order trial procedure

Best Crop Science Pvt. Ltd. v. Principal Commissioner, CGST Commissionerate, Meerut and Ors.

24 Sep 2024 · Vibhu BakhrU; Sachin Datta

The Delhi High Court held that Rule 86A of the CGST Rules permits blocking input tax credit beyond the available balance in the Electronic Credit Ledger to the extent of fraudulent or ineligible credit, as a protective revenue measure.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Input Tax Credit Electronic Credit Ledger Rule 86A Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017

M/S SOM PROJECTS PVT LTD v. M/S HLL INFRA TECH SERVICES LIMITED (HITES)

23 Sep 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:7164

The Delhi High Court allowed a six-month extension of the arbitrator's mandate under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with no objection from the respondent.

arbitration petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29A(4) extension of arbitrator mandate arbitration proceedings

Dr. Prabhat Kumar Singh v. Employees State Insurance Corporation & Ors.

23 Sep 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:7343
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the enforceability of a compulsory bond signed by a medical student with ESIC, dismissing his plea to return original documents without payment of the bond amount.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant compulsory bond medical education retention of documents ESIC

Sudarshan Facilities Pvt Ltd v. The Regional Labour Commissioner Central New Delhi

23 Sep 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:7405

The Delhi High Court set aside a non-speaking ex-parte order under the Minimum Wages Act and directed fresh proceedings with a speaking order after considering the petitioner’s contentions.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Minimum Wages Act, 1948 speaking order ex-parte order wage payment

Anil Shah v. Union of India & Anr

23 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7334

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal for compensation under the Railway Claims Tribunal Act due to the appellant's failure to prove he was a bonafide passenger and that his injuries resulted from an untoward incident on the train.

civil appeal_dismissed Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 bonafide passenger untoward incident compensation claim

Shahi Idgah Managing Committee v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

23 Sep 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:7324

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the installation of a statue on the park adjoining Shahi Idgah, holding the park belongs to DDA and the petitioner had no right to restrain the respondents.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Waqf property Article 226 Delhi Development Authority Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Lucky v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

23 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7337

The Delhi High Court quashed a rape FIR under Section 376 IPC after the parties amicably settled and solemnized marriage, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 376 IPC rape

Gateway Investment Management Services Ltd v. Reserve Bank of India & Ors.

23 Sep 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:7320

The Delhi High Court held that challenges to the Committee of Creditors' commercial wisdom in approving resolution plans under the IBC must be adjudicated by the NCLT, not through writ jurisdiction.

corporate petition_dismissed Significant Committee of Creditors Commercial Wisdom Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Resolution Plan

Ravi Kumar v. Department of Space

23 Sep 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:7359-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of ISRO's recruitment process, dismissing the petition of a candidate challenging his non-selection after participating without objection in the prescribed selection procedure.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant selection process administrative officer recruitment normalization of marks interview weightage

Sudarshan Facilities Pvt Ltd v. The Regional Labour Commissioner Central New Delhi

23 Sep 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:7406

The Delhi High Court set aside a non-speaking ex-parte order under the Minimum Wages Act, directing fresh proceedings and a reasoned order after considering the petitioner's submissions.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Minimum Wages Act, 1948 speaking order ex-parte order wage payment

Shweta v. Central Board of Secondary Education & Anr.

23 Sep 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:7349

The Delhi High Court directed CBSE to correct the petitioner’s Class 10th certificate to reflect her biological mother’s name, recognizing her fundamental right to identity and dignity under the Constitution.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant right to identity biological mother educational certificate correction writ jurisdiction

Vishal Nehra & Ors. v. The State, Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr

23 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7338

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement between the parties, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute amicable settlement

Neerupama Thapa v. National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences & Anr.

23 Sep 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:7351

The Delhi High Court upheld the debarment of a candidate from NEET (PG)-2024 for furnishing false information in NEET (PG)-2023 application, rejecting claims of double jeopardy and procedural unfairness.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant NEET (PG) unfair means cancellation of candidature debarment

Dilsher Nepali & Anr. v. State

23 Sep 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:7345

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Sections 323/34 IPC but reduced the appellants' sentence to the period already served, granting leniency due to the long delay and good conduct.

criminal sentence_modified Section 323 IPC Section 34 IPC sentence reduction leniency in sentencing

Naresh Kumar Solanki v. State

23 Sep 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:7347

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 325 IPC but reduced the appellant's sentence to the period already served, considering the long delay and his good conduct.

criminal sentence_modified Section 325 IPC sentence reduction delay in appeal good conduct

Rajesh Kumar Saini v. Neetu Saini

23 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7382

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for early hearing and directed the delayed written statement to be taken on record subject to payment of costs to prevent further delay in the civil suit between family members.

civil appeal_allowed condonation of delay written statement civil suit early hearing

Cheema v. Birla Sun Life Insurance Company Limited

23 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7383

The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition challenging an NCDRC order for lack of territorial jurisdiction, allowing withdrawal with liberty to approach the Bombay High Court.

civil petition_allowed Significant Article 227 jurisdiction National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

MS Ratan Chandra Spices and Food Products Pvt Ltd v. Kamini Bhatia Proprietor of MS Mahima Herbs and Anr

23 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7386

The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Trial Court’s refusal to direct production of vague and unavailable electronic communications and held that such directions cannot be issued to non-parties under Order XI Rules 5 and 6 CPC.

civil petition_dismissed Order XI Rule 5 CPC Order XI Rule 6 CPC Section 151 CPC production of documents