Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Radico Khaitan Ltd v. M/S Raina Beverages & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to Radico Khaitan Ltd. against defendants for infringing its registered trademark and copyright in the "Magic Moments Remix" trade dress, holding that the defendants' use constituted infringement and passing off.
TATA CAPITAL LTD v. UNITECH ASSOCIATES & ANR
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate loan repayment disputes and directed exploration of mediation before adjudication.
Tata Capital Ltd v. Unitech Associates & Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate loan repayment disputes and directed the arbitrator to encourage mediation before adjudication.
Shri Aruj Seth & Ors. v. State (NCT. of Delhi) Through SHO, PS. Tilak Nagar & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.
Sh Ravi Kant & Ors. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute case following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.
R P FOAM HOME (P) LTD. v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
The Delhi High Court upheld the reopening of the petitioner's income tax assessment for AY 2011-12 under Section 148, holding that the Assessing Officer had valid reasons to believe income had escaped assessment based on new information.
M.R Apparels Private Limited v. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax - 6
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the revision of the appellant's tax assessment under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act for failure to verify dishonoured cheques related to the sale of immovable property.
Tata Capital Ltd v. Unitech Associates & Anr.
Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and directed exploration of mediation before adjudication in a loan dispute.
Tata Capital Ltd v. Unitech Associates & Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and directed the arbitrator to encourage mediation before adjudicating disputes arising from a loan agreement.
Tata Capital Ltd v. Unitech Associates & Ors.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate loan repayment disputes and directed the arbitrator to explore settlement through mediation before adjudication.
Bhawana Sharma & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under minor IPC offences following an amicable settlement between neighbors, emphasizing the scope of Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process in such cases.
Central Govt. Employees Consumer Cooperative Society Ltd. v. Sgt Sanjeev Kumar
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant's appeal partially, holding it entitled to recover INR 13,15,054 with reasonable interest from the respondent under a franchise agreement, while rejecting the respondent's counter claim for lack of evidence.
BRY-AIR (ASIA) PVT. LTD. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition to quash the deemed withdrawal of a patent application caused by the negligence of the Patent Agent, restoring the application to enable prosecution.
Geeta Gandhi v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for CBI investigation into the alleged murder conspiracy but transferred the ongoing FIR investigation from Leh to Delhi Police for thorough inquiry.
Geeta Devi v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court awarded ex-gratia compensation for the death of an infant due to a dog bite but declined to hold the Municipal Corporation liable under writ jurisdiction due to disputed facts and private premises, leaving further negligence claims to civil courts.
Prashant Manchanda v. Union of India & Ors
Delhi High Court allowed DUSU voting but postponed vote counting until candidates remove election-related defacement and reimburse civic agencies, enforcing Lyngdoh Guidelines.
Govind T Samani v. Ashwin Aloysrus Dsouza & Anr
The Delhi High Court reduced an excessive bond amount fixed by the NCDRC under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, emphasizing that bonds must be reasonable and solely to ensure appearance.
M/S. SHELTER MAKER (I) PVT. LTD. & ORS. v. SHAKUNTALA S. AGARWAL & ORS.
Delhi High Court dismissed a petition challenging NCDRC orders for lack of territorial jurisdiction, directing the petitioner to approach the Bombay High Court as per Supreme Court precedent.
Shelter Maker Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. Anand Mundra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Article 227 for lack of jurisdiction, holding that consumer dispute challenges must be filed before the High Court where the cause of action arose, as per Supreme Court precedent.
Shelter Maker Pvt Ltd & Ors. v. Babulal M Parekh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Article 227 for lack of jurisdiction, holding that consumer dispute petitions must be filed before the High Court where the cause of action arose.