Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Danish & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr

27 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7497

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

Master Arnesh Shaw v. Union of India & Anr.

27 Sep 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to release funds for continuation of treatment of children with rare diseases and mandated streamlining of medicine procurement to uphold patients' right to health.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant National Policy for Rare Diseases, 2021 continuation of treatment fund release AIIMS Delhi

Ayra Roy v. Union of India & Ors.

27 Sep 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:7503

The Delhi High Court directed release and consolidation of assets left by deceased parents to their minor child, including provident fund and insurance claims, and urged empathetic treatment of outstanding loan dues.

civil other Significant minor child deceased parents COVID-19 provident fund

Viphil Jain v. State NCT of Delhi

27 Sep 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:7540

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail for the kingpin of a spurious anti-cancer injection racket, holding that his central role and risk of evidence tampering outweigh parity with co-accused granted bail.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail spurious medicines anti-cancer injections kingpin

Rustam Beg (Deceased) Thr Lrs v. Union of India & Ors

27 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7547

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file additional documents belatedly in a suit for permanent injunction, emphasizing judicial discretion and fairness while imposing costs for delay.

civil appeal_allowed Significant permanent injunction discretion to admit documents delay in filing documents Article 227 Constitution of India

Mahender Singh & Ors. v. Hukam Chand

27 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7550

The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to grant an effective opportunity for cross-examination when affidavits were supplied on the same day contrary to its own order for advance copy, emphasizing procedural fairness.

civil petition_allowed Significant Examination-in-Chief affidavit advance copy cross-examination

M/S SPELL ORGANICS LTD v. M/S APSOM TURNER PVT LTD & ANR

27 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7552

The High Court allowed the petitioner’s challenge to the deletion of a defendant under Order I Rule 10 CPC, permitting the defendant to lead evidence and directing the Trial Court to decide mis-joinder issues afresh.

civil appeal_allowed Order I Rule 10 CPC deletion of parties mis-joinder of parties leading evidence

Bhim Singh v. Ram Kumar

27 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7553

The High Court set aside the Trial Court's cryptic order granting conditional leave to defend under Order XXXVII CPC and directed a fresh, reasoned consideration of the application.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXXVII CPC leave to defend conditional leave promissory note

CS Construction Company Pvt Ltd v. Excelling Geo and Engineering Consultant Pvt Ltd

27 Sep 2024 · MANMOHAN, ACJ; Tushar Rao Gedela, J · 2024:DHC:7521-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the DIAC coordinator's administrative order reassessing arbitrator's fees separately for claim and counter claim, dismissing the appeal for lack of jurisdictional error or exceptional circumstances.

arbitration appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Delhi International Arbitration Centre Rules, 2018 Arbitrator's fee Jurisdiction of DIAC coordinator

Suhail Ahmed Khan v. Union of India

27 Sep 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:7515-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the hereditary appointment of the Shahi Imam and his son lacks legal validity without Wakf Board ratification and directed authorities to ensure proper management and protection of Jama Masjid.

administrative other Significant Shahi Imam Jama Masjid Wakf Board appointment of Imam

Vishnu Verma and Ors v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr

27 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7495

The Delhi High Court quashed a dowry harassment FIR following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of court process.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Dowry Prohibition Act amicable settlement

Sunny Anand & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

27 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7490

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court process.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC Section 482 CrPC

Karan Tejpaul & Anr v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr

27 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7499

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354A, 506, 509, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR amicable settlement inherent powers

Kajol Gupta v. Sarthak Jain

27 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7554

The Delhi High Court granted the petitioner one final limited opportunity to conclude cross-examination in a divorce proceeding despite prior refusals, imposing costs for delay.

family appeal_allowed cross-examination matrimonial dispute trial court discretion procedural delay

Varun Gupta v. Suman Grover & Anr.

27 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner limited cross-examination on a subsequently filed certificate under Section 65-B Indian Evidence Act and disposed of related petitions in a recovery suit.

civil appeal_allowed Section 65-B Indian Evidence Act Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 certificate of electronic record cross-examination

Sawan Khokhar & Ors. v. State & Anr.

27 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7498

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties, holding that continuing criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC Section 34 IPC

Union of India v. Mahender Singh

27 Sep 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:257-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT’s order setting aside disciplinary punishment imposed without furnishing UPSC advice to the charged officer, reaffirming the requirement of natural justice in disciplinary proceedings.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disciplinary proceedings UPSC advice natural justice non-supply of documents

ARN INFRASTRUCTURES INDIA LIMITED v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-28 DELHI & ORS.

26 Sep 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that reassessment under Section 148 beyond limitation is barred unless supported by valid findings, affirming that no additions can be made in completed assessments without incriminating material found during search, while preserving the Revenue's reassessment powers under Sections 147/148 subject to statutory conditions.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 149(1) Section 150

Chandra Global Finance Ltd v. ITO Ward 6(1) New Delhi & Anr

26 Sep 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:7439-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed reassessment notices issued on grounds of mere change of opinion, reaffirming that reopening assessments requires tangible reasons to believe income has escaped assessment beyond previously considered facts.

tax petition_allowed Significant reassessment change of opinion Section 147 Income Tax Act Section 148 Income Tax Act

Apoorvi Sood v. Netaji Subhas Institute of Technology

26 Sep 2024 · Jyoti Singh

The Delhi High Court held that faculty appointments made through a regular selection process against sanctioned posts must be treated as regular despite contractual terms, directing NSIT to regularize the Petitioners' services with consequential benefits.

labor appeal_allowed Significant regularization of appointment contractual appointment selection committee sanctioned posts