Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Rashida Khatoon v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a murder case after finding no direct role in the stabbing and considering settled legal principles on bail in serious offences.
BKP Enterprise & Ors. v. Spicejet Limited
The Delhi High Court held that no binding contract existed between the plaintiffs and SpiceJet for Haj operations due to an unexecuted Letter of Intent and fraudulent concealment, dismissing the plaintiffs' suit for damages and specific performance.
Raghav Garg v. Income Tax Officer Ward 35 (1) Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the Assessing Officer's reopening of assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act based on credible information of bogus purchases from non-existent suppliers, dismissing the petitioner's challenge.
Shyamal Jana & Ors. v. Reliance Commercial Finance Limited
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award passed by a unilaterally appointed arbitrator and appointed an independent sole arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute afresh under DIAC rules.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -7, Delhi v. Sony India Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order dismissing Revenue's appeal against deletion of transfer pricing adjustments on royalty, stock valuation, warranty provisions, and CSR expenditure under the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Pragati Kesharwani v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld ONGC's cancellation of a disabled candidate's appointment on medical grounds, affirming employer's prerogative to enforce medical standards and rejecting the binding nature of the Chief Commissioner's recommendation.
M/S MILI MARKETING PVT. LTD v. M/S AMBIENCE PVT. LTD. & ANR.
The Delhi High Court granted a four-month extension of the arbitrator's mandate under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with no objection from the respondents.
M/S PARASRAMKA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD v. M/S AMBIENCE PVT. LTD & ANR.
The Delhi High Court granted a four-month extension to the mandate of the learned Arbitrator under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with no objection from the respondents.
M/S MORAN PLANTATIONS PVT. LTD v. M/S AMBIENCE PVT. LTD & ANR
The Delhi High Court extended the mandate of the arbitrator by four months under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, allowing continuation of arbitration proceedings.
Dr Monika Bansal v. Lt Governor of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed timely payment of salary arrears due to retrospective promotions, rejecting budgetary constraints as justification for delay.
Chander Bose v. Madhu Bansal & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the registration of a second FIR as a permissible counter-complaint by the accused in the first FIR when it discloses a distinct cause of action.
Mahender & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of the court's process.
Nigam Prakash & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.
Akash Pack Tech (P) Limited v. M/S Today Tea Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as time barred, holding that the appellant failed to provide a credible and sufficient cause for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, especially given contradictory explanations and prior participation in the suit.
Rohit Madan v. Aditya Madan
The High Court upheld the executing court's payment direction but allowed the judgment debtor to submit a payment schedule and part payment for consideration.
Gaurav Enterprises v. Rajiv Gandhi Super Speciality Hospital & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the tender conditions for security services, holding that tender requirements are within the exclusive domain of the issuing authority and that exclusion of bonus from the price bid is permissible if reimbursed separately.
Sudhir Kumar Dhingra v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court quashed the cancellation of a DDA flat allotment due to improper service of notices and directed re-allotment of a similar flat, emphasizing that delay caused by administrative lapses does not bar relief.
Sushma v. State NCT of Delhi
Pre-arrest bail was denied to the mother-in-law accused of dowry harassment leading to the unnatural death of her daughter-in-law, emphasizing the statutory presumption under Section 113B Indian Evidence Act and the necessity of custodial interrogation.
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Balbir Kaur
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Article 227 for lack of jurisdiction, holding that the petitioner must approach the Punjab & Haryana High Court as the cause of action arose there.
MD Shakil v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of murder under Section 302 IPC after considering hostile witness testimony, prolonged custody, and imposing stringent conditions to mitigate risks.