Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Ajay Tyagi v. Anheuser Busch Inbev India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the mandatory deposit of 20% of the fine under Section 148 NI Act as a condition for suspension of sentence pending appeal, rejecting the petitioner's claim of financial incapacity due to lack of evidence.
Shakuntala Devi v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking leave to appeal against the acquittal of accused persons in an assault case, holding that the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to inconsistencies and lack of corroboration.
Madhu Bala & Anr. v. Deepika Arora
The Delhi High Court held that unregistered Agreements to Sell and Power of Attorney do not confer ownership or title, and a suit for possession based solely on such documents without proof of possession or registered sale deed is liable to be rejected.
Arun G S v. Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking study leave and relieving order for M.Sc. Nursing, holding that the petitioner’s application was not timely under the governing Circular and that study leave must be granted on a first come first serve basis after admission.
National Highway Authority of India v. Roadways Solution India Private Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed NHAI's challenge under Section 34 to an arbitral award granting payment for extended contract work and refund of liquidated damages, holding the award was not patently illegal or against public policy.
Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd v. Ess Kay Enterprises
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate loan repayment disputes and directed exploration of settlement through mediation.
Raj Kishan Chabra LR Anil Chabra v. Bharat Kalra
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order allowing substitution of legal heirs beyond the 90-day limitation period by condoning delay and reading setting aside of abatement into the substitution application.
Abbott Healthcare Private Limited v. Union of India & RITES Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that liquidated damages imposed unilaterally by an agent on behalf of a disclosed principal are valid without prior arbitration, and failure to implead the principal in arbitration bars recovery of arbitration costs from the agent.
Ajay Tyagi v. Anheuser Busch Inbev India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the mandatory 20% deposit condition under Section 148 NI Act for suspension of sentence in cheque bounce cases, refusing exemption in absence of evidence of financial incapacity.
Anheuser Busch InBev India Ltd. v. Ajay Tyagi
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellate court's order requiring the petitioner to deposit 20% of the fine amount as a condition for suspension of sentence under Section 138 NI Act, holding that exceptions to this deposit condition require specific reasons and supporting evidence.
Anheuser Busch InBev India Ltd. v. Ajay Tyagi
The Delhi High Court upheld the mandatory deposit of 20% of the fine under Section 148 NI Act as a condition for suspension of sentence pending appeal, dismissing the petitioner's claim of financial incapacity without supporting evidence.
Aktiebolaget Volvo & Ors. v. Lamina Suspension Products Limited
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction against unauthorized use of 'VOLVO' and 'FMX' trademarks on leaf springs, allowing limited descriptive use with disclaimers under a summary judgment based on parties' settlement.
Galaxy IEC India Private Limited v. DCM Shriram Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that at the appointment stage under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, the Court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed a Sole Arbitrator despite respondent's objections on arbitrability.
M/S STAR SHARES & STOCK BROKERS LTD v. PRAVEEN GUPTA & ANR
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award, affirming limited judicial interference under Section 34 and upholding the arbitral tribunal’s discretion in awarding interest and deciding claims on merits.
Jagdish Kumar v. Ramjani @ Kailash & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the motor accident claim appeal, enhancing compensation by assessing 100% functional disability for a commercial driver with 90% physical disability, emphasizing occupation-based loss of earning capacity.
Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co. Ltd v. Zeenat Khan and Others
The Delhi High Court modified a motor accident compensation award by applying a multiplier of 15 for a deceased child under 15 years, upheld calculation of notional income based on minimum wages, and maintained interest at 9% per annum.
BOSCH LTD. v. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE & ANR
The Delhi High Court directed the authority to reconsider the petitioner's MEIS claim on merits despite procedural omission in shipping bills, allowing amendment and personal hearing before a speaking order.
BOSCH CHASSIS SYSTEM INDIA PVT. LTD. v. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE
Delhi High Court directed re-examination of MEIS claims where procedural omission occurred, mandating personal hearing and speaking order to ensure just administrative decision.
TV Today Network Limited and Others v. Sanatan Sanstha and Others
The Delhi High Court disposed of the suit against defendant no. 3 on his undertaking, passed permanent and mandatory injunctions against defendants no. 1 and 2, and allowed withdrawal of damages claim against defendant no. 1 while reserving damages claim against defendant no. 2.
Deepinder Singh Bedi & Anr. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that dishonour of a cheque due to the drawer's bank account being frozen by the Income Tax Department does not attract liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and quashed the complaint accordingly.