Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Sehegal Hossain v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused under PMLA after balancing his right to liberty against the nature of the offence and stage of trial, emphasizing mandatory compliance with Section 45 PMLA conditions.
Castrol Limited v. Vipin, Trading as All in One Business Solutions and Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunctions and damages to Castrol Limited against defendants for trademark and copyright infringement and passing off involving the mark 'SUPER CASTROL' and directed withdrawal of infringing trademark applications.
Avtar Singh Mankoo v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court held that DDA must send allotment notices to all addresses on record and that cancellation without proper notice is arbitrary, allowing petitioners' claims despite delay under Article 226.
Master Enterprises Pvt Ltd v. Jay Kay Coir Foam Pvt Ltd & Anr
The Delhi High Court cancelled the respondent’s trademark registration 'MOLTY' for lack of prior use and likelihood of confusion with the petitioner’s well-known mark, affirming that proposed use and trans-border reputation confer proprietary rights under Section 18 of the Trade Marks Act.
Vishal Kochhar v. Pallavi Kashyap Kochhar
The Delhi High Court increased the paternal grandmother's visitation time with the child on her birthday from five to fifteen minutes, emphasizing reasonable visitation rights in guardianship matters.
Sanjay Kumar v. The State Govt of NCT Delhi and Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 337 IPC arising from a motor vehicle accident after the parties amicably settled and compensation was paid, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Commissioner of Police v. Harish Chhikara
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's quashing of a police constable's dismissal post-acquittal, holding departmental punishment requires additional evidence beyond that in the criminal trial under Rule 12(e) of DPPAR.
Capital Broadways Pvt. Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer Ward 5(3) Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that mechanical approval without reasons under Section 151 of the Income Tax Act invalidates the reopening notice under Section 148, quashing the impugned notice issued to the petitioner.
Deepak Yadav v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the Indian Air Force's selection process for Airmen 'Y' Group, dismissing the petition challenging non-selection despite equal marks, as the selection criteria were lawfully and fairly applied.
Pankaj Yadav v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Standing Screening Committee to consider the petitioner's acquittal and pass a reasoned order within 10 days on his candidature for CISF training, quashing mechanical referral based solely on an FIR.
M/S Jainsons Lights (Pvt) Ltd v. Ashraf
The Delhi High Court dismissed the money recovery appeal, holding that the appellant failed to prove business transactions and delivery to establish jurisdiction and entitlement to the claimed amount.
MS. G v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the State and intermediaries to collaboratively and expeditiously remove and prevent dissemination of non-consensual intimate videos recorded without consent, affirming the legal duty to protect victims' privacy and dignity under the IT Act and constitutional provisions.
Campos Brothers Farms v. Matru Bhumi Supply Chain Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a foreign arbitral award, once final and unchallenged on merits, extinguishes the original cause of action, barring a subsequent suit on the same cause, and dismissed the plaintiff's suit as barred by res judicata.
Ashish Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A/34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Prem Chand & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR involving minor offences under IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.
Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd v. Shahan Parveen & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the compensation award based on the deceased's salary as Rs. 12,500/- per month, rejecting the insurer's contention to apply minimum wages in absence of documentary proof.
Ms. Manmeet Kaur, Mr. Gurtejpal Singh, Mr. Abhishek Rana, Ms. Aashna Arora v. Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that recording satisfaction of an arbitral award under Order XXI Rule 2 CPC requires mutual consent and certification by the decree-holder, and dismissed the Judgment Debtors' applications alleging settlement without such consent or documentary proof.
Thijs, Roeland Michel Mathieu v. Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs
The Delhi High Court allowed the restoration of a patent where the renewal notification was sent to an incorrect email address by the patent office, holding that the patent holder cannot be penalized for such communication errors.
M/S Lenswire Innovations Private Limited & Anr. v. Indian Bank
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to verify compliance with mandatory service requirements under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 by obtaining process reports before deciding on summary dismissal applications.
M/S GTL INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. v. BABU LAL YADAV
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that an arbitration clause permitting unilateral appointment of the arbitrator is invalid and cannot be enforced under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.