Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Smt. Harpyari (Deceased) through LR-1A Bharat Bhushan Sharma v. Badri Bhagat Jhandewala Temple Society and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the dismissal of a criminal application under Section 340 CrPC alleging forgery of an affidavit, holding that the error was attributable to the Notary Public and lacked substantive proof.
Seth Sunder Lal Sonthalia Trust v. Rani
The Delhi High Court held that ownership disputes cannot be adjudicated in eviction proceedings under the Delhi Rent Control Act, and impleadment of parties requires direct and substantial interest, dismissing the application to implead a co-owner claiming title.
Prem Singh Sehrawat v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the regular bail application of Prem Singh Sehrawat in a case involving recovery of illegal arms, emphasizing the seriousness of the offence, the applicant's conduct, and public safety concerns despite medical grounds and delay in trial.
Emeka Prince Lath v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of a petitioner accused of heroin trafficking, holding that non-compliance of Section 50 NDPS Act applies only to personal searches and procedural defects did not warrant bail given the commercial quantity and ongoing trial.
Dr. Girish Soni v. Sean Wee Lee and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to dispose of a long-pending eviction petition under the Delhi Rent Control Act within four months, enforcing prior Supreme Court directions for expeditious disposal.
Isha Tanwar v. Dinesh Lohia
The High Court allowed reinstatement of the petitioner's written statement in a divorce proceeding upon payment of costs and directed the Trial Court to permit cross-examination and evidence, emphasizing procedural compliance and expeditious disposal.
Avinesh Kumar v. Delhi Development Authority and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that a lone worshipper without personal interest or lawful possession cannot maintain a suit for injunction against demolition of an unauthorized temple on government land, affirming the bar under Section 91 CPC and Section 41(j) of the Specific Relief Act.
Anil Madan & Anr. v. RBL Bank Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging categorization as 'wilful defaulters' and 'non-cooperative borrowers' as premature, directing petitioners to file replies per RBI procedural guidelines.
M/S JES AND BEN GROUPO PVT. LTD. v. M/S SHAKTI TRADING CO
The High Court directed payment of outstanding court costs before allowing the defendant to lead evidence, ensuring procedural fairness in a commercial suit.
Susheela Rana & Ors. v. Brij Bhushan Rana
The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal as not pressed and directed the Trial Court to expeditiously decide the injunction application in a partition suit after the appellant ceased construction activity.
M/S DWARKADHIS PROJECTS PVT. LTD v. SHRI PRATAP CHAND NASA & ANR
The Delhi High Court held that it lacks jurisdiction under Article 227 to entertain a petition against an NCDRC order when the cause of action arose elsewhere, allowing withdrawal with liberty to approach the appropriate High Court.
FIITJEE LTD v. HANS RAJ SHARMA
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Article 227 challenging an NCDRC order for lack of territorial jurisdiction, directing the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional High Court where the cause of action arose.
Master Arnesh Shaw v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court mandates the Union of India to provide sustainable, timely, and free treatment for rare disease patients by finalizing a National Policy, establishing a dedicated fund, and promoting indigenous drug development and crowdfunding under the constitutional right to health.
Master Arnesh Shaw v. Union of India & Anr.
Delhi High Court upheld the fundamental right to health for rare disease patients, directing the Union of India to notify a National Policy, establish a Rare Diseases Fund, and promote indigenous therapies and alternative funding mechanisms.
Lava International Limited v. Mintellectuals LLP
The Delhi High Court upheld arbitral tribunal's orders directing enhanced interim security by bank guarantee, emphasizing limited judicial interference and adequacy of reasons under the Arbitration Act.
Anil Kumar Maggu v. Food Corporation of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a contract termination clause permitting termination without reason upon notice, dismissing writ petitions challenging the termination as a pure contractual dispute not warranting judicial interference.
Ramandeep Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of Ramandeep Singh, a key accused in a large heroin trafficking syndicate, holding that the serious nature of the offence, commercial quantity involved, and corroborative evidence outweigh grounds for bail despite prolonged custody.
Ramesh Kumar v. The State
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a cheating and criminal breach of trust case, holding that imposing a monetary deposit as a bail condition in private disputes is improper and emphasizing cooperation with investigation.
Waseem Seikh v. State of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail applications of husband and wife accused under the NDPS Act, emphasizing the seriousness of the offence, absconding conduct, and ongoing investigation despite no direct recovery from them.
Deepika Prashar & Anr v. Suman Singh Virk & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity and binding effect of a family settlement for partition and possession of property, ordering defendants to hand over possession and pay damages for unlawful retention.